The massacre of St. Bartholomew : $b Preceded by a history of the religious wars in the reign of Charles IXWhite, Henry
History
The massacre of St. Bartholomew : $b Preceded by a history of the religious wars in the reign of Charles IX
White, Henry
France -- History -- Wars of the Huguenots, 1562-1598; Saint Bartholomew's Day, Massacre of, France, 1572
At Toulouse a somewhat similar league had been formed, and a
proclamation issued against the followers of the new religion. In that
singular document, which was founded on a bull issued by Pius V. in
March, 1568, the Protestants are described as “atheists, men living
without God, without faith, and without law.” Jesus Christ himself
inspires all good Catholics with “the idea of assuming the cross,
taking up arms, and preparing a war like Mattathias and the other
Maccabees.” The faithful are reminded of the heretical Albigenses
destroyed in that very district to the number of 60,000; and are
exhorted to pursue with the same fervor these “new enemies of God,”
and to show them no mercy. If the crusaders die in the expedition,
“their blood will serve them as a second baptism, washing out all their
sins; and they will go with the other martyrs straight to paradise.”
The qualifications for taking up the cross in this holy war were “to
confess their sins and arm themselves with the body and blood of our
Lord;” but these arms were not thought sufficient. “If the capitouls
[magistrates] will lend a few cannons, things will go on all the
better. Resolved at Toulouse, 21st September, 1568. The above is done
under the authority of our Holy Father the Pope.” Priests were to be
the captains of this “holy army of faith,” and its motto was: _Eamus
nos; moriamur cum Christo_.[421]
Immediately after the signing of the treaty of Longjumeau the
Protestant army had been disbanded, and the reiters in their pay had
returned to Germany, not without excesses on the road; but under
various excuses the royal army, including the Swiss mercenaries and
the Italian auxiliaries, was still kept on foot. The motive soon
became apparent: the reactionary party meditated a bold stroke that
should cripple, if not entirely crush, the Huguenot party. Condé, the
admiral and other chiefs were to be seized, and of the fate intended
for some of them there can be no doubt. Only two months earlier,
Alva’s “blood council” had condemned Counts Egmont and Horn to a
violent death. As early as May, all the bridges along the Loire were
guarded. This may have been a mere matter of police in the disturbed
state of the country; but the Huguenots very reasonably considered
it as a means of controlling their movements and preventing their
escape, if danger threatened them. Their leaders were widely separated;
Andelot was in Brittany, La Rochefoucault in Angoulême, D’Acier in
Languedoc, Bruniquet and Montglas in Gascony, Genlis and Mouy in
Picardy, Montgomery in Normandy, the Admiral at Tanlay, and Condé at
his castle of Noyers in Burgundy. These two places are so near that
tradition speaks of a subterranean passage between them. Tanlay is
placed in a secluded spot between Tonnerre and Montbard. On a splendid
chimney-piece in the large hall may still be seen a head of Coligny in
a plumed helmet, admirably carved in delicately tinted marble.[422]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account