The massacre of St. Bartholomew : $b Preceded by a history of the religious wars in the reign of Charles IXWhite, Henry
History
The massacre of St. Bartholomew : $b Preceded by a history of the religious wars in the reign of Charles IX
White, Henry
France -- History -- Wars of the Huguenots, 1562-1598; Saint Bartholomew's Day, Massacre of, France, 1572
The king’s marriage was an opportunity for gayeties not to be lost.
It is said that one of his motives for concluding the treaty of St.
Germains was the unwillingness of the Emperor Maximilian to part with
his daughter while France was in a state of civil commotion. There
may have been other causes of delay, for very unfavorable reports
of the king’s health and disposition had got abroad. His character
certainly had not improved during the few years he had occupied the
throne. He was fond of athletic sports, and excelled in jumping and
tennis. He took delight in shoeing horses and working at the forge,
like a blacksmith.[466] He was addicted to the chase “even to frenzy,”
passing whole days and nights in the woods.[467] This made him “cruel
toward beasts, but _not_ toward men.”[468] Sometimes he and his
madcap associates would tear along the roads, decapitating any unlucky
donkey he might encounter, or transfixing stray pigs with his hunting
spear.[469] Then, as if maddened by the sight of blood, he would dabble
in their entrails like a butcher. He was fond of practical jokes; often
at night he would break into the bedrooms of his young companions, pull
them out of bed, and flog them as if they were school-boys. He was not
licentious, and Marie Touchet was the object of a sincere passion.
Perjury seemed to him nothing but a figure of speech and no crime; he
therefore violated his word as often as it seemed profitable to do
so. But fortunately for the human race “men are not all evil,” and in
his lucid moments--for Charles was at times quite insane--he appears
affectionate and desirous of doing what is right. When at Bayonne, he
quite disgusted the unscrupulous Alva by saying that to take up arms
against his own subjects was quite out of the question, and could only
be followed by general ruin. Though no soldier, he had seen service
at the sieges of Bourges, Rouen, Havre, and St. Jean d’Angely, and
possessed all the ambition of his race to extend the frontiers of
his kingdom. There were times when he courted the society of men
of letters, and would shut himself up with “his friends” Ronsard,
Baif, Passerat, or Theodore Corneille, to compose verses. Nor was he
himself a stranger to the Muses, if the fragments ascribed to him
are really from his pen. Even his treatise on hunting--_La Chasse
royale_--shows him to have possessed considerable skill. Such was
the man to whose word the Huguenots had entrusted their property and
lives, and to whom the Emperor of Germany was about to entrust his
daughter. Perhaps it was hoped that the amiable Elizabeth would tame
him down, as in later years and in another country Peter the Czar was
controlled by the low-born Catherine.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account