The massacre of St. Bartholomew : $b Preceded by a history of the religious wars in the reign of Charles IXWhite, Henry
History
The massacre of St. Bartholomew : $b Preceded by a history of the religious wars in the reign of Charles IX
White, Henry
France -- History -- Wars of the Huguenots, 1562-1598; Saint Bartholomew's Day, Massacre of, France, 1572
As soon as the important matters of the Navarre marriage and the
English treaty were concluded, Charles left Touraine (May 5th), and
proceeded by way of Fontainebleau to Paris, and thence to St. Maur.
The admiral attended him more as a friend than as one of the great
officers of state. The Guises had left the court almost in despair. If
any credit can be given to an intercepted dispatch of the 28th January
from the Countess of Northumberland, the duke had paid a long secret
visit to Alva.[526] This was denied by Catherine, but may have been
true, nevertheless. Although this visit may have had more to do with
the affairs of Mary Stuart, we may be sure that the state of France
and the Anjou marriage were not forgotten. It is not clear when the
Guises fell into disgrace, but their position at court in the spring
of 1572 is accurately discussed in a letter from Alva to Philip II.,
who had written advising him to keep up friendly relations with the
duke and the cardinal. The general replied that he had always seen
the importance of doing so: “But at this time there are two things
to be considered, namely, that none of the family have any share in
the management of public business, except the Cardinal of Lorraine;
and he, when in favor, is insolent and forgets every body, and when
in disgrace, is good for nothing.” Then, as if to brand the treason
of the churchman, and show the unfriendly nature of the relations
between the courts of Paris and Madrid, Alva continues: “He has warned
me, through Fray Garcia de Ribeira, to be on my guard, as he foresees
trouble in France, and believes that the fleet assembling at Rochelle
is intended to operate against the Low Countries.”[527] When the Duke
of Guise and Coligny were at Paris in May, the former was forbidden to
undertake any thing against the Chatillons, to which he replied, that
if the admiral had any thing to complain of, he was ready to meet him
at any time in single combat.[528] The king, finding the duke (whom he
called “un mauvais garçon”) so implacable, required of him a complete
and formal denial of every project of outrage against Coligny, which he
gave, though with reluctance (12th May, 1572). There is another story
that the king did not press Duke Henry to be reconciled, having already
had proof of his impracticable character; but to Aumale, his brother,
who seemed more tractable, he said: “Have a little patience, and you
will soon see a pretty game.”[529] Were the story true, it would not
necessarily imply the existence of a plot to get rid of the Huguenots.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account