The massacre of St. Bartholomew : $b Preceded by a history of the religious wars in the reign of Charles IXWhite, Henry
History
The massacre of St. Bartholomew : $b Preceded by a history of the religious wars in the reign of Charles IX
White, Henry
France -- History -- Wars of the Huguenots, 1562-1598; Saint Bartholomew's Day, Massacre of, France, 1572
No sooner was the panic over and the Guises once more felt secure, than
the religious persecutions were renewed with all their former severity.
The old edicts against the Christaudins or Sacramentarians were
revived, and commissions were appointed to receive secret evidence. To
make the persecution more effectual, the Cardinal of Lorraine tried
once more to introduce all the forms of the Inquisition without the
name, and obtained a resolution of the royal council entrusting the
entire cognizance of heresy to the prelates of the Church, and ordering
that their sentence should be final, the heretics being handed over to
the secular arm for punishment. L’Hopital, the new chancellor, resisted
the encroachment on the broad grounds that the right of trial and
punishment of _all offenses_--whether against person, property,
or religion (except in the case of ecclesiastics)--lay with the king;
that the right of appeal to the royal tribunals could not be taken
away; and that the judgment on those appeals should be delivered by
lay judges. He succeeded thus far in establishing the axiom, that “no
power in the state possessed sovereign authority of life or death over
the subjects of such state, except the king.” But he was compelled
to yield in other points, and being of opinion that it is politic to
permit a small mischief to escape a greater, he gave an unwilling
consent to the edict of Romorantin (May, 1560), which declared that
the cognizance of heresy should remain with the bishops, who were to
proceed in the usual manner. This was a great sacrifice to intolerance,
but it really gave the bishops no new power. Other clauses declared all
persons attending conventicles guilty of high treason, and assigned
a reward of 500 crowns to informers; to which the singular provision
was appended, that all calumnious informers should be subjected to the
_peine du talion_, in other words, suffer the punishment to which
their victims were liable. To a certain extent this edict recognized
the complaints of the Reformers by ordering the bishops to reside
in their dioceses, and the parish priests to tend their flocks more
carefully, teach them properly, and live among them. The new chancellor
might well be proud of his work, the first hesitating step in the path
of toleration. The Parliament of Paris refused to register the decree
on the ground that it encroached on the civil power, and L’Hopital had
to struggle for ten days before he could overcome their resistance.
The fear of a repetition of the “tumult of Amboise” had frightened the
Cardinal of Lorraine into accepting the edict; but his brother Francis
bluntly declared he would never draw the sword in its defense. This was
quite in his style, for he hated the Reformed not only because they
were rebels against the Church, but because they were attached to the
Bourbon princes. Navarre, indeed, was not very formidable, it being
always possible to hold him in check by playing upon his selfishness;
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account