The massacre of St. Bartholomew : $b Preceded by a history of the religious wars in the reign of Charles IXWhite, Henry
History
The massacre of St. Bartholomew : $b Preceded by a history of the religious wars in the reign of Charles IX
White, Henry
France -- History -- Wars of the Huguenots, 1562-1598; Saint Bartholomew's Day, Massacre of, France, 1572
It was supposed that a general council by restoring unity to the
Church would cure many of the evils under which France suffered.
The queen-mother supported this opinion, and we may imagine we hear
her speaking in a letter written by Francis II. to the Bishop of
Limoges: “The Church of God,” he says, “will never enjoy peace or
rest, never shall we see the end of the troubles and calamities which
this religious division is bringing over all the Christian world,
unless a general council be convened.... It is notorious that the
Council of Trent has not been received or approved by Germany or by
the Protestants, who have attacked its authority, as having been
held without them.... We Christian princes ought to try by all means
to invite the Protestants and Germans to the council, ... it being
my opinion that it had better not open at all, if the Germans and
Protestants are not invited, for it would be labor in vain.” Such
was the tone in which the king wrote to the pope, and such were the
sentiments he desired Limoges to lay before the King of Spain. He even
went so far as to threaten to hold a national council, if the pope were
obstinate. “It is undeniable,” he said, “that there are so many abuses
in the manners of churchmen, that there are but few of them who do
their duty. Now this neglect breeds that contempt for divine things, by
which men are led to forsake God and fall into those errors wherein we
now see them.” In a similar strain he wrote to the Bishop of Rennes,
his embassador at the imperial court.[134]
In a somewhat similar tone wrote the Cardinal of Lorraine to the same
bishop, urging the necessity of a council, and blaming the coldness of
the pope. He complains of the “pitiful condition into which religion
had fallen,” and declares a council to be “the only remedy for all our
ills.” In nearly the same words writes Florimond de Robertet, secretary
of state, adding that the king was resolved at all events “to convoke
an assembly of notables.”
These opinions compared with the instructions given to the French
prelates at the Council of Trent may be taken as evidence that the
court was sincere in its desire to purify the national church. Those
ecclesiastics were to demand that the ceremonial should be corrected
and all other things whereby the ignorant might be abused under a
show of piety; that the cup should be restored to the laity; that the
sacraments should be administered in the vulgar tongue; that during
mass the Word of God should be read and interpreted, and the young
people should be catechised, to the end that all might be instructed
in what they should believe, and how they should live so as to please
God; that prayers should be offered up in French, and that certain
times should be appointed, as well at high mass as at vespers, wherein
it might be lawful to sing psalms in the church. The prelates were also
instructed to complain of the unchaste lives of the clergy.[135]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account