The massacre of St. Bartholomew : $b Preceded by a history of the religious wars in the reign of Charles IXWhite, Henry
History
The massacre of St. Bartholomew : $b Preceded by a history of the religious wars in the reign of Charles IX
White, Henry
France -- History -- Wars of the Huguenots, 1562-1598; Saint Bartholomew's Day, Massacre of, France, 1572
portions, and carried them on sticks triumphantly round the town. One
of the wretches offered a morsel of the liver to a dog which refused to
touch it. With a kick and an oath the man howled out: “Are you too a
Lutheran like Mouvans?”[140] An inquiry was ordered into the outrage,
but the passions of all the province were too much excited to permit
justice to be done. “You have killed the old one,” said one of the
royal commissioners, “why don’t you kill the young one? I would not
give a straw for your courage. Down with all these rascally Lutherans,
kill them all.” Paul now took up arms, and after inflicting much damage
upon his adversaries, was finally compelled to take refuge at Geneva.
Of the morals of these “rascally Lutherans” in this part of France, we
have the unimpeachable testimony of Procureur Marquet of Valence, who
says that, for the eight years he held the office of town-clerk, not
a day passed but his registers were full of complaints of outrages of
every kind committed during the night. The streets were unsafe after
dark, and the citizens were not secure from robbery and violence even
in their own houses. Then he adds: “But after the preaching of the
Gospel, all that was altered, as if a change of life had accompanied
a change of doctrine.” No one was found bold enough to contradict such
testimony.
One of the first persons to raise his voice against the persecution of
the Huguenots was L’Hopital, the chancellor. In his inaugural address
to the Parliament of Paris (5th July, 1560) he boldly declared the
Church to be the cause of the religious disorders through its evil
example; the soldiers were unpaid and justified their violence; the
mass of the people both in town and country were ignorant and wicked,
because the priests preached to them about tithes and offerings, and
said nothing about godly living; and that the only remedy was a general
council. He went on to argue that the diseases of the mind are not
to be healed like those of the body, adding, that “though a man may
recant, he does not change his heart.”[141]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account