The Mathematical Theory of RelativityEddington, Arthur Stanley, Sir
Science
The Mathematical Theory of Relativity
Eddington, Arthur Stanley, Sir
Relativity (Physics)
When an observer uses non-Galilean coordinates, he will as usual treat
them as though they were Galilean and attribute all discrepancies to the
effects of the field of force which is introduced. $\kappa_{\mu}$, $F_{\mu\nu}$ and~$J^{\mu}$ will be identified
with the potential, force, and current, just as though the coordinates were
Galilean. These quantities will no longer accurately obey Maxwell's original
form of the equations, but will conform to our generalised tensor equations
\Eq{(73.73)} and~\Eq{(73.74)}. The replacement of~\Eq{(73.72)} by the more general form~\Eq{(73.74)}
extends the classical equations to the case in which a gravitational
field of force is acting in addition to the electromagnetic field.
\Section{74.}{Electromagnetic waves}
\index{Electromagnetic action!waves, propagation of}%
\index{Light!propagation of}%
\index{Waves!electromagnetic}%
\Subsection[(a)]{Propagation of electromagnetic potential.}
\index{Propagation!of electromagnetic waves}%
It is well known that the electromagnetic potentials $F$, $G$, $H$, $\Phi$ are not
determinate. They are concerned in actual phenomena only through their
curl---the electromagnetic force. The curl is unaltered, if we replace
\[
-F,\ -G,\ -H,\ \Phi\quad\text{by}\quad
-F + \frac{\dd V}{\dd x},\
-G + \frac{\dd V}{\dd \smash[b]{y}},\
-H + \frac{\dd V}{\dd z},\
\Phi + \frac{\dd V}{\dd t},
\]
where $V$~is an arbitrary function of the coordinates. The latter expression
gives the same field of electromagnetic force and may thus equally well be
adopted for the electromagnetic potentials.
It is usual to avoid this arbitrariness by selecting from the possible values
the set which satisfies
\[
\frac{\dd F}{\dd x} + \frac{\dd G}{\dd y} + \frac{\dd H}{\dd z} + \frac{\dd\Phi}{\dd t} = 0.
\]
Similarly in general coordinates we remove the arbitrariness of~$\kappa_{\mu}$ by imposing
the condition
\[
(\kappa^{\mu})_{\mu} = 0.
\Tag{(74.1)}
\]
When the boundary-condition at infinity is added, the value of~$\kappa_{\mu}$ becomes
completely determinate.
By \Eq{(73.74)} and~\Eq{(73.3)}
\begin{align*}
J = (F_{\mu}^{\alpha})_{\alpha}
&= (g^{\alpha\beta} F_{\mu\beta})_{\alpha} = g^{\alpha\beta} (F_{\mu\beta})_{\alpha} \\
&= g^{\alpha\beta} (\kappa_{\mu\beta\alpha} - \kappa_{\beta\mu\alpha})
\Tag{(74.2)}\displaybreak[0] \\
&= g^{\alpha\beta} (\kappa_{\mu\beta\alpha} - \kappa_{\beta\alpha\mu} + B_{\beta\alpha\mu}^{\epsilon} \kappa_{\epsilon})
\quad\text{by~\Eq{(34.3)}}\displaybreak[0] \\
&= g^{\alpha\beta} (\kappa_{\mu})_{\beta\alpha} - (\kappa_{\alpha}^{\alpha})_{\mu} + G_{\mu}^{\epsilon} \kappa_{\epsilon}.
\end{align*}
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account