The Maya Chronicles: Brinton's Library Of Aboriginal American Literature, Number 1
History
The Maya Chronicles: Brinton's Library Of Aboriginal American Literature, Number 1
Maya language -- Glossaries, vocabularies, etc.; Maya language -- Texts; Mayas -- Antiquities; Mayas -- History
_Nonoalco_ was also the name of a small village near the city of Mexico
which still appears on the maps. Sahagun tells us that some extreme
eastern tribes in Mexico called themselves _Nonoalca_ (_Historia de la
Nueva España_, Lib. X, cap,[TN-13] XXIX, p[TN-14] 12); and the
licenciate Diego Garcia de Palacio mentions "quatro lugares de Indios
que llaman los Nunualcos" as dwelling, in his time (1576), in the
eastern part of the province of San Salvador, of Aztec descent, and who
had recently come there. (_Carta al Rey de España_, p. 60, New York,
1860). It should be mentioned in reference to these names and all others
of similar vocalization, that both in Maya and Nahuatl the Spanish
constantly confound the short ŏ and ŭ. As the Bachelor Don Antonio
Vasquez Gastelu observes: "usan de la _o_ algunos tan obscuramente, que
tira algo à la pronunciacion de la _u_ vocal" (_Arte de lengua
Mexicana_, fol. 1, verso, La Puebla de los Angeles, 1726).
Señor Alfredo Chavero, in his Appendix to Duran's _Historia de las
Indias de Nueva España_ (p. 45, Mexico, 1880), claims that _Nonoalca_
was the name given to the Maya-Kiche tribes, or rather adopted by them,
when, at an extremely remote epoch, they penetrated to the central table
land of Mexico. He thinks that subsequently they became united with the
Toltecs, and were dispersed with that people at the destruction of the
city of Tula. The grounds for this theory he claims to find in certain
unpublished manuscripts, which unfortunately he does not give in
extracts, but only in general statements. Like much that this writer
presents, these assertions lack support. All the names he quotes as of
Nonoalca, that is, Maya origin, are distinctly not of the latter tongue,
but are Nahuatl. And the introduction of the mystical city of Tula is of
itself enough to invest the story with the garb of unreality.
It is, in fact, nowhere in terrestrial geography that we need look for
the site of the Tula of Quetzalcoatl, nor at any time in human history
did the Tolteca ply their skillful hands, nor Tezcatlipoca spread his
snares to destroy them. All this is but a mythical conception of the
daily struggle of light and darkness, and those writers who seek in the
Toltecs the ancestors or instructors of any nation whatsoever, make the
once common error of mistaking myth for history, fancy for fact.
Therefore, any notion that Yucatan was civilized by the Toltecs after
their dispersion, or owes anything to them, as so many, and I might say
almost all recent writers have maintained, is to me an absurdity.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account