The meaning of a liberal educationMartin, Everett Dean
Philosophy
The meaning of a liberal education
Martin, Everett Dean
Education
“A narrow and moralistic view of morals is responsible for the
failure to recognize that all the aims and values which are desirable
in education are themselves moral. Discipline, natural development,
culture, social efficiency, are moral traits--marks of a person
who is a worthy member of that society which it is the business of
education to further. There is an old saying to the effect that it
is not enough for a man to be good; he must be good for something.
The something for which a man must be good is capacity to live
as a social member so that what he gets from living with others
balances with what he contributes. What he gets and gives as a human
being, a being with desires, emotions, and ideas, is not external
possessions, but a widening and deepening of conscious life--a more
intense, disciplined, and expanding realization of meanings. What
he _materially_ receives and gives is at most opportunities and
means for the evolution of conscious life. Otherwise, it is neither
giving nor taking, but a shifting about of the position of things in
space, like the stirring of water and sand with a stick. Discipline,
culture, social efficiency, personal refinement, improvement of
character are but phases of the growth of capacity nobly to share
in such a balanced experience. And education is not a mere means to
such a life. Education is such a life. To maintain capacity for such
education is the essence of morals.”
Moral behavior is not only social. It is also _intelligent_ behavior.
An act has moral significance when the performance shows _insight_ into
the situation. An action done under compulsion or without understanding
has no moral value. A machine may behave very correctly but it is not
a moral being. An act has moral meaning to just the extent that its
author grasps the implications of the situation in which he must act
and is guided by consideration of the results. An act is judged, not as
moralists would have it, merely by the intention, but by its results.
It is the aim of education to develop the insight and foresight and
breadth of vision which make it possible for an individual to take
responsibility for the results of his behavior. The greater the
intelligence, the more nearly does the consideration of an act approach
the estimate of the total result. Thus _the aims of education and
morals are the same_;--the good life in so far as it may be attained by
intelligent choice and behavior.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account