The mediaeval stage, volume 2 (of 2)Chambers, E. K. (Edmund Kerchever)
History
The mediaeval stage, volume 2 (of 2)
Chambers, E. K. (Edmund Kerchever)
Drama, Medieval -- History and criticism; Theater -- History -- Medieval, 500-1500
The plays were given annually and in one day at the feast of Corpus
Christi. Contrary to the custom of the northern towns, there were only
some ten or twelve pageants, each covering a fairly wide range of
incident (cf. p. 423). Nor can the performances be shown to have been
repeated at more than three or four stations. ‘Gosford Street,’ ‘Mikel’
or ‘Much Park Street end’ and ‘Newgate’ are recorded, and in one of these
may have been the house of Richard Wodes, where Queen Margaret lay. The
Drapers only provided three ‘worlds’ for their pageant, and probably
one was burnt at each station. According to the _Annals_, part of the
charges of the plays was met by the enclosure of a piece of common land
(possibly to build pageant houses upon). Otherwise they fell wholly upon
the crafts, to some one of which every artisan in the town was bound to
become contributory for the purpose. The principal crafts were appointed
by the Leet to produce the pageants, and with each were grouped minor
bodies liable only for fixed sums, varying from 3_s._ 4_d._ to 16_s._
8_d._ In 1501 an outside craft, the Tilemakers of Stoke, is found
contributing 5_s._ to a pageant. These combinations of crafts varied
considerably from time to time. Within the craft the necessary funds were
raised, in part at least, by special levies. Strangers taking out their
freedom were sometimes called upon for a contribution. Every member of
the craft paid his ‘pagent pencys.’ In several crafts the levy was 1_s._
Amongst the Smiths it must have been less, as they only got from 2_s._
2_d._ to 3_s._ 4_d._ in this way, whereas the Cappers in 1562 collected
22_s._ 4_d._ In 1517 William Pisford left a scarlet and a crimson gown to
the Tanners for their play, together with 3_s._ 4_d._ to each craft that
found a pageant. The total cost of the Smiths’ play in 1490 was £3 7_s._
5½_d._ In 1453 we find the Smiths contracting with one Thomas Colclow
to have ‘the rewle of the pajaunt’ for twelve years, and to produce the
play for a payment of 46_s._ 8_d._ A similar contract was made in 1481.
But as a rule, the crafts undertook the management themselves, and the
account-books studied by Sharp afford more detailed information as to
the mode of production than happens to be available for any other of the
great cycles.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account