The mediaeval stage, volume 2 (of 2)Chambers, E. K. (Edmund Kerchever)
History
The mediaeval stage, volume 2 (of 2)
Chambers, E. K. (Edmund Kerchever)
Drama, Medieval -- History and criticism; Theater -- History -- Medieval, 500-1500
The English miracle-play reaches its full development with the
formation of the great processional cycles almost immediately after the
establishment of the Corpus Christi festival in 1311. The local tradition
of Chester, stripped of a certain confusion between the names of two
distinct mayors of that city which has clung about it, is found to fix
the foundation of the Chester plays in 1328. The date has the authority
of an official municipal document, forms part of a quite consistent
story, several points in which can be independently corroborated, and
is on _a priori_ grounds extremely plausible. Unfortunately, owing to
the comparative scarcity of archives during this period, the first
fifty years of the history of municipal drama are practically a blank.
A mention, about 1350, of a _ludus filiorum Israelis_, in connexion
with a guild of Corpus Christi at Cambridge, spans a wide gulf. There
is no actual record of plays at Chester itself until 1462. Those of
Beverley are first mentioned in 1377, those of York in 1378, and those
of Coventry in 1392. But it must be added that the Beverley plays were
an _antiqua consuetudo_ in 1390, and that those of York were to take
place at stations _antiquitus assignatis_ in 1394. It is in 1378 that
the earliest notice of plays in London, since the days of William
Fitzstephen, comes to light. The fuller records which are from this
time onward available reveal, during the next hundred and fifty years,
a vigorous and widespread dramatic activity throughout the length and
breadth of the land. It manifests itself at such extreme points as the
Cinque Ports in the east, Cornwall in the west, and Newcastle in the
north. It penetrates to Aberdeen and to Dublin. And though naturally
it finds its fullest scope in the annually repeated performances of
several amongst the greater cities, yet it is curious to observe in
what insignificant villages it was from time to time found possible to
organize plays. Performers from thirteen neighbouring places, many of
them quite small, made their way to New Romney between 1399 and 1508;
whilst the churchwardens of Chelmsford, in the twelve years after their
own play in 1562, reaped a profit by hiring out their stock of garments
to the men of some seventeen aspiring parishes. On the other hand,
there were several important towns in which, so far as we can judge
from documents, such as craft ordinances, which would almost certainly
have referred to the plays of the crafts, if these had existed, the
normal type of municipal drama failed to establish itself. London is
one, although here the want was supplied in another way; others are
Northampton, Nottingham, Bristol, Oxford, and Reading. And occasionally
plays, which had once been annual, were allowed to fall into desuetude
and decay. The corporation of Canterbury, for instance, called upon the
crafts about 1500 to revive a Corpus Christi play which for some time
had been ‘left and laid apart.’ Certainly, by the sixteenth century, if
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account