The Memoirs of Admiral Lord BeresfordBeresford, Charles William De la Poer Beresford, Baron
History
The Memoirs of Admiral Lord Beresford
Beresford, Charles William De la Poer Beresford, Baron
Admirals -- Great Britain -- Biography; Great Britain -- History, Naval -- 19th century
Exactly how weak it was in June, 1888, in the opinion of the First Sea
Lord, Admiral Sir Arthur Hood, was explained by him before the Select
Committee on Navy Estimates (13th June, 1888). "I should have
preferred by the end of 1890 to have had six more fast cruisers. I do
not consider it a point of vital importance," said Admiral Hood. But
as, upon his own showing, within his recollection no one at the
Admiralty had ever produced a scheme comprehending the naval
requirements of the Empire, his view was hardly conclusive. I had the
audacity to consider that if no one had ever attempted, or thought of
attempting, to estimate the requirements of the naval defence of the
Queen's dominions, it was time that some one did attempt to do so, even
if that some one were myself. Accordingly, I made a careful
calculation of the work the Fleet might under probable contingencies be
required to perform, and upon that calculation based an estimate of the
classes and numbers of ships which would be needed.
{359}
I showed my estimate to Admiral Hornby, who said that, although the
ships were absolutely necessary, I was asking too much and I should in
consequence get nothing. He also pointed out that I had made no
provision for the increase of personnel required to man the proposed
new ships. I replied that if the ships were laid down, the authorities
would be obliged to find the men for them. The sequel showed that I
was wrong and that Admiral Hornby was right. He knew his responsible
authority better than I did. Six years later, when what should have
been the increased personnel would have been trained and available, the
Fleet was short of 20,000 men.
My cousin, General Sir Reginald Talbot, reminds me of a conversation
which befell between Mr. Goschen, then Chancellor of the Exchequer, and
myself, in November of the same year, 1888, when we were staying at
Wilton, the house of my cousin, Lady Pembroke. Mr. Goschen began to
talk about the Navy, and he was so good as to express high disapproval
of my course of action. He said I was doing a great deal of harm, that
I was presuming to set my rash opinion above the considered judgment of
old and distinguished officers who had commanded ships before I was
born, and so forth.
"Do you know what I am shortly going to propose to Parliament?" said I.
"No? I'll tell you. I am going to ask for seventy ships to cost
twenty million sterling."
Mr. Goschen became really angry. He said the notion was preposterous.
"You won't get them," he said. "You wouldn't get even three ships, if
you asked for them. And for a very simple reason. They are not
wanted."
"Mr. Goschen," said I, "I shall bring in that programme, and it will
cost twenty million; and you will all object to it and oppose it; and
yet I'll venture to make a prophecy. Before very long you will order
seventy ships at the cost of twenty million. And for a very simple
reason. Because you must."
{360}
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account