The Memoirs of François René Vicomte de Chateaubriand sometime Ambassador to England, Volume 4 (of 6): Mémoires d'outre-tombe volume 4Chateaubriand, François-René, vicomte de
History
The Memoirs of François René Vicomte de Chateaubriand sometime Ambassador to England, Volume 4 (of 6): Mémoires d'outre-tombe volume 4
Chateaubriand, François-René, vicomte de
Chateaubriand, François-René, vicomte de, 1768-1848
"Why should not liberty maintain herself in the edifice
raised by despotism and filled with its traces? Victory,
still so to speak decked with the three colours, has taken
refuge in the tent of the Duc d'Angoulême; the Legitimacy
inhabits the Louvre, even though the eagles be still seen
there.
"In a constitutional monarchy, the public liberties are
respected; they are considered as the safeguard of the
Sovereign, the people and the laws.
"We understand representative government otherwise. A company
is being formed (they say even two rival companies, for
competition is needful) to corrupt the newspapers with
bribes of money. They are not afraid to maintain scandalous
prosecutions against proprietors who have refused to sell
themselves; they would like to force them to be stigmatized
by the sentence of the tribunals. This trade being repugnant
to men of honour, they enlist, to support a Royalist
ministry, libellers who have persecuted the Royal Family
with their calumnies. They recruit all who served in the
former police and in the imperial ante-chamber, even as our
neighbours, when they wish to procure sailors, send the
press-gang into the taverns and disorderly houses. Those
convict-crews of free writers are embarked on five or six
bought newspapers, and what they say is called 'public
opinion' at the Ministers[269]'."
There, very greatly abridged, and still perhaps at too great length, is
a specimen of my polemical warfare in my pamphlets and in the _Journal
des Débats_: in it will be found all the principles that are being
proclaimed to-day.
[Sidenote: I refuse my pension.]
When I was turned out of the ministry, my pension as a minister of
State was not restored to me; I did not claim it; but M. de Villèle,
upon an observation of the King's, thought of sending me a new warrant
for that pension through M. de Peyronnet[270]. I refused it. Either I
was entitled to my former pension, or else I was not entitled to it: in
the first case I had no need for a new warrant; in the second, I did
not wish to become the pensioner of the President of the Council.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account