The memoirs of Philip de Commines, Lord of Argenton, Volume 1 (of 2) : $b Containing the histories of Louis XI. and Charles VIII., Kings of France, and of Charles the Bold, Duke of Burgundy. To which is added the Scandalous chronicle, or, secret history of Louis XI., by Jean de Troyes.Commynes, Philippe de
History
The memoirs of Philip de Commines, Lord of Argenton, Volume 1 (of 2) : $b Containing the histories of Louis XI. and Charles VIII., Kings of France, and of Charles the Bold, Duke of Burgundy. To which is added the Scandalous chronicle, or, secret history of Louis XI., by Jean de Troyes.
Commynes, Philippe de
France -- History -- House of Valois, 1328-1589
35. And in case there are any articles that cannot presently be
executed, but that it shall be necessary that they should be
examined and determined by commissioners, whom the king and the
duke shall appoint, and that in order to this a convenient time
be also assigned; and that it may so happen that though the
said commissioners have not full power from the king and the
duke to determine the things left to their cognizance: insomuch
that the said matters may be delayed through the difficulties
which may occur, as well in respect to the knowing, as making
a declaration of the rights of the parties; let the king and
the duke, if they are so pleased, expedite their powers,
by which both sides shall agree, that, in case the said
commissioners cannot accord, they may choose an umpire, an
able man, who cannot be suspected of partiality, to whom they
shall declare and impart their difficulties and differences;
and when he shall be fully instructed in the whole affair,
he shall declare his opinion according to his conscience,
and without any favour or affection. And so the matter shall
be adjudged and determined, according to the advice of those
the said commissioners who shall be of the umpire’s opinion,
notwithstanding the opposition of the rest, with a salvo always
to the greatest and soundest part in number of persons and
opinions of the said commissioners, by whose advice the matter
shall be determined as effectually as if all the commissioners
had agreed to it. And in case the said commissioners shall
not be able to agree among themselves about the choice of an
umpire, those on the king’s side shall be obliged to name two
worthy persons, and the duke’s commissioners as many, neither
of whom shall be natives, or the subjects of either of them,
nor suspected of partiality; out of which four, one shall be
chosen by lot, who shall be the umpire, to decide the matter as
aforesaid; and if the commissioners who shall be appointed by
the king do not agree in the choice of an umpire as aforesaid,
in that case the duke’s commissioners may do it without them.
And, on the contrary, if the said commissioners of the duke do
not agree to it, those of the king’s may in like manner do it
without them. And that choice, together with the king’s which,
by virtue thereof, shall be made, shall be as valid as if done
by the commissioners on both sides by common consent; and the
said commissioners on one side may proceed in the said affair,
by default, and upon the refusal of the commissioners on the
other side, and act with the said umpire, in the same manner as
if all the commissioners were together. And all that shall be
determined, done, and executed, in the things aforesaid, shall
remain firm and valid for ever; and that the said commissioners
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account