The memoirs of Philip de Commines, Lord of Argenton, Volume 1 (of 2) : $b Containing the histories of Louis XI. and Charles VIII., Kings of France, and of Charles the Bold, Duke of Burgundy. To which is added the Scandalous chronicle, or, secret history of Louis XI., by Jean de Troyes.Commynes, Philippe de
History
The memoirs of Philip de Commines, Lord of Argenton, Volume 1 (of 2) : $b Containing the histories of Louis XI. and Charles VIII., Kings of France, and of Charles the Bold, Duke of Burgundy. To which is added the Scandalous chronicle, or, secret history of Louis XI., by Jean de Troyes.
Commynes, Philippe de
France -- History -- House of Valois, 1328-1589
About four or five days after the taking of the town, the king began to
employ his friends about the duke, to propose his return into France;
and he himself broke the matter to him very discreetly, telling him,
that if he had still any occasion of his assistance, he should freely
let him know it and he would willingly stay longer, but that if his
presence could be of no farther importance, he desired to be dismissed,
that he might return to Paris, and see the peace published in the court
of parliament.[259] (For in France it is a custom that all treaties of
peace should be published in that court, or otherwise they are void,
though indeed the king’s power is very great.) Besides, he desired of the
duke that they might have another interview next summer in Burgundy, and
enjoy the conversation of one another for a month together. At length
the duke consented he should go, yet not without murmuring a little.
The duke ordered the articles of peace to be read to the king, that, if
he repented of anything, it might be altered. He offered it likewise to
his choice, whether he would stand to it or not, and some little apology
he made for his bringing him thither. He desired one thing more, which
was, that the king would permit a new article to be added in favour of
the Lord du Lau, the Lord d’Urfé, and Poncet de Rivière[260] and that
he would promise that the lands and preferments, which they had enjoyed
before the war, should be restored to them again. This proposition did
not please the king at all, for he thought it very unreasonable that
those who were not of his party should be comprehended in the peace.
Besides, they were servants to the Lord Charles, the king’s brother,
and not to the king. However, the king replied that he would consent
to it, upon condition that the duke would do the same for the Count of
Nevers[261] and the Lord of Croy; upon which answer the duke pressed
it no farther. This answer of the king’s was looked upon to be a very
wise one, for the duke hated those two gentlemen, so that he would never
consent to their restoration. In all the rest, the king told the duke
he would alter nothing, but confirm whatever had been sworn at Peronne.
In this manner his departure was agreed on, and the king took his leave
of the duke[262], who conducted him about half a league, but at their
last departure the king said to him, “If my brother, who is in Bretagne,
should not be satisfied with the appanage, which for your sake I have
given him, what would you have me do?” The duke hastily replied, without
considering what he said, “If he should not, it is your part to see him
satisfied, but I shall leave that to yourselves.” From which question and
answer important actions did afterwards proceed, as you shall hear in the
proper place.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account