The memoirs of Philip de Commines, Lord of Argenton, Volume 1 (of 2) : $b Containing the histories of Louis XI. and Charles VIII., Kings of France, and of Charles the Bold, Duke of Burgundy. To which is added the Scandalous chronicle, or, secret history of Louis XI., by Jean de Troyes.Commynes, Philippe de
History
The memoirs of Philip de Commines, Lord of Argenton, Volume 1 (of 2) : $b Containing the histories of Louis XI. and Charles VIII., Kings of France, and of Charles the Bold, Duke of Burgundy. To which is added the Scandalous chronicle, or, secret history of Louis XI., by Jean de Troyes.
Commynes, Philippe de
France -- History -- House of Valois, 1328-1589
Those who were in Amiens had a design to sally out and attack the Duke of
Burgundy’s army, if the king would have advanced, and joined them with
the forces which he had at Beauvais. But the king, having notice of their
design, sent express orders to forbid it; for though, in all probability,
this action was likelier to turn to his advantage than otherwise, yet
it could not be attempted without manifest danger, especially to those
in the town, for they were obliged to sally out of the gates; and there
being but two, and one of them very near the Duke of Burgundy’s army,
and their whole body consisting of infantry, if they had been repulsed,
it would have been difficult for them to have made their retreat, and
they would have been in great danger, not only of being cut in pieces
themselves, but also of losing the town. In this posture of affairs the
Duke of Burgundy despatched one of his pages (called Simon de Quingy,
who was afterwards Bailiff of Troyes) with a letter to the king, only of
six lines, but under his own hand. The letter was very humble, and in it
he complained that he had been tempted to invade him upon other people’s
designs, and declared that, if he had been rightly informed, he was
confident he never would have attempted it.
Meanwhile the king’s army in Burgundy had fought and defeated the whole
force of that country, and though the number of the slain was not very
considerable, yet the victory was great; many prisoners were taken, and
an abundance of towns besieged and carried by storm. The news of this
defeat extremely surprised the Duke of Burgundy, who immediately caused
a report to be spread in his army that his forces had won the battle.
The king was highly pleased at the receipt of the Duke of Burgundy’s
letter, for the reasons above mentioned, and because he did not love
to carry on tedious enterprises; he returned him an answer, and sent a
commission to empower certain persons in Amiens to enter upon a truce. At
first a cessation was agreed on for some few days only; but at length,
as I remember, they had one for a year[290], with which the Constable
of St. Paul seemed to be highly displeased: and without doubt (whatever
some people may say or think to the contrary) the constable was the
Duke of Burgundy’s mortal enemy. Several treaties and conferences they
had, but never the least friendship proceeded from any of them, as the
event demonstrated. Yet they continued sending one to the other, and
endeavouring a reconciliation; the duke did it in hopes by this means to
recover St. Quentin, for whenever the constable entertained the least
suspicion or fear of the king, he promised to restore that town; and
sometimes it proceeded so far, that, by the consent of the constable, the
Duke of Burgundy’s forces approached within two or three leagues of the
town, in expectation to be received; but when they were to be admitted,
the constable’s heart always failed him, and he sent them back, which
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account