The memoirs of Philip de Commines, Lord of Argenton, Volume 1 (of 2) : $b Containing the histories of Louis XI. and Charles VIII., Kings of France, and of Charles the Bold, Duke of Burgundy. To which is added the Scandalous chronicle, or, secret history of Louis XI., by Jean de Troyes.Commynes, Philippe de
History
The memoirs of Philip de Commines, Lord of Argenton, Volume 1 (of 2) : $b Containing the histories of Louis XI. and Charles VIII., Kings of France, and of Charles the Bold, Duke of Burgundy. To which is added the Scandalous chronicle, or, secret history of Louis XI., by Jean de Troyes.
Commynes, Philippe de
France -- History -- House of Valois, 1328-1589
Those who hereafter may read these Memoirs, may think I have spoken very
disrespectfully, and with too much freedom, of these two great princes,
or that else they were persons of but small honour or faith. I would not
willingly speak ill of either of them; and what great obligations I have
to the king my master all the world knows. But to continue my history in
the same manner (as you, my good Lord Archbishop of Vienne, have desired
me) I am obliged to give an impartial and true account of what I know,
which way soever it happened. However, were they to be compared with the
rest of the great princes that reigned in Europe at the same time, they
would appear noble and conspicuous, and our king very wise, for he left
his kingdom enlarged, and at peace with all his enemies. But now let us
observe a little what artifices and stratagems they used to overreach
and circumvent one another, that in case any young prince, who has the
same game to play, should hereafter accidentally meet with this history,
he may, by reading it, be prepared, and defend himself the better; for
though neither enemies nor princes are always alike, yet their affairs
being often the same, it is not altogether unprofitable to be informed
of what is past. To give then my opinion, I am very confident these two
princes had the same desire of circumventing each other, and their ends
(as you shall hear afterwards) were the same.
Each of them had a numerous army in the field; the king had taken several
towns, and whilst the treaty was on foot, pressed his brother very hard.
There were already come over to the king, of the Duke of Guienne’s
party, the Lord of Curton[355], Patris Foucart[356], and several others.
The king’s army had actually invested La Rochelle, and held great
intelligence in the town, which was much increased by the report of
the peace, and the Duke of Guienne’s illness; and I believe the king’s
resolution was (if either he succeeded in his enterprise there, or his
brother died) not to swear to the peace; but, if the enemy got the
better of him, he would then swear, and keep his engagements, to deliver
himself from danger. In this manner he spun out his time, managed all his
affairs with wonderful diligence, and, as you have heard, kept Simon de
Quingy eight days together in suspense, and in the meantime his brother
happened to die; for he knew the Duke of Burgundy was so intent upon the
restitution of those two towns[357], that he durst not be angry, but
might securely be wheedled for a fortnight or three weeks, till he saw
what he had best do; and so it fell out.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account