The memoirs of Philip de Commines, Lord of Argenton, Volume 1 (of 2) : $b Containing the histories of Louis XI. and Charles VIII., Kings of France, and of Charles the Bold, Duke of Burgundy. To which is added the Scandalous chronicle, or, secret history of Louis XI., by Jean de Troyes.Commynes, Philippe de
History
The memoirs of Philip de Commines, Lord of Argenton, Volume 1 (of 2) : $b Containing the histories of Louis XI. and Charles VIII., Kings of France, and of Charles the Bold, Duke of Burgundy. To which is added the Scandalous chronicle, or, secret history of Louis XI., by Jean de Troyes.
Commynes, Philippe de
France -- History -- House of Valois, 1328-1589
The truce lasted a whole year, and during that time this plot was
contriving against the Constable of France. The king’s agents applied
themselves to one of the Duke of Burgundy’s knights, called the Lord
of Humbercourt, who for a long time had hated the constable, but more
particularly of late, upon the following occasion: In a convention at
Roye, where the constable and others were met on the king’s part, with
the Chancellor of Burgundy, the Lord of Humbercourt, and others in behalf
of the duke, in the heat of their argument, the constable in a passion
gave the Lord of Humbercourt the lie. The Lord of Humbercourt made no
other reply, but that he would not expect satisfaction from him, but from
the king, upon whose security he was come thither, under the character of
an ambassador; for the affront was not so much to him as to his master,
whose person he represented, and to whom he would give an account. This
single piece of insolence, which was so suddenly committed, was the
occasion afterwards not only of the constable’s death, but also of the
ruin of his family, as the sequel of this history will inform you. For
this reason, persons in great authority, and princes themselves, ought to
be careful of their language, and consider to whom it is they speak; for
the greater the person is, the greater is the injury, and it lies heavier
upon him that is affronted, because he thinks the grandeur and authority
of him that committed the outrage make it more remarkable, and more
liable to be objected against him. If it be one’s own king or master, it
makes one despair of a further preferment from him; and generally the
hope of future advancement makes courtiers serve a prince better and more
faithfully than the thought of what they already possess.
But to return. The king’s agents made continual applications to the Lord
of Humbercourt and the chancellor (who was present when that abusive
language was given at Roye, and was besides a particular friend of the
Lord of Humbercourt); and so far they proceeded in that affair, that they
appointed a meeting at Bouvines, which is a town not far from Namur,
to consult further about it. On the king’s part there were the Lord of
Curton, Governor of Limousin, and Monsieur John Heberge[381], afterwards
Bishop of Evreux; and for the Duke of Burgundy, there were the Chancellor
of Burgundy and the Lord of Humbercourt, whom I have already mentioned.
This was in the year 1474.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account