The memoirs of Philip de Commines, Lord of Argenton, Volume 1 (of 2) : $b Containing the histories of Louis XI. and Charles VIII., Kings of France, and of Charles the Bold, Duke of Burgundy. To which is added the Scandalous chronicle, or, secret history of Louis XI., by Jean de Troyes.Commynes, Philippe de
History
The memoirs of Philip de Commines, Lord of Argenton, Volume 1 (of 2) : $b Containing the histories of Louis XI. and Charles VIII., Kings of France, and of Charles the Bold, Duke of Burgundy. To which is added the Scandalous chronicle, or, secret history of Louis XI., by Jean de Troyes.
Commynes, Philippe de
France -- History -- House of Valois, 1328-1589
These passages I learned from several persons, and particularly from the
mouth of Monsieur James de St. Paul, who, when he was prisoner, told them
to the king, when nobody was present but myself, and the sincerity of his
answers was very serviceable to him. The king demanded of him what number
of troops he designed to have put into the town. He told his majesty
that, on the third occasion, he had 3000. Then the king asked him if he
had succeeded, and entered the town, for whom he would have kept it?
whether for him or for the constable? Monsieur James de St. Paul replied,
that on the first two occasions he came only to encourage his brother;
but the third time, having observed that his brother had twice before
deceived both his master and his majesty, if he had found his party the
strongest, he would have kept it for his master, but without any violence
or detriment to his brother; only if he had commanded him to evacuate the
town, he would have disobeyed his orders. Not long after this private
conference, the king released Monsieur James, gave him men-at-arms and a
large estate, and employed him afterwards in several affairs as long as
he lived; and all because of the freedom and sincerity of his answers.
Since I began to speak of Nuz, I have intermingled several occurrences,
which, however, were coincident; for the siege continued a year[429], and
they happened during that time. There were two things which mightily
tempted the Duke of Burgundy to raise the siege: one was the war which
the King of France had begun against him in Picardy, in which he had
burnt three pretty little towns[430], and wasted a good part of the flat
country in Artois and Ponthieu; the other was the great army which, at
his request and solicitation, the King of England had raised; for he had
been importuning him all his life long to invade France, and could never
effect it till now. The King of England and all his nobility were highly
discontented at the Duke of Burgundy’s delays, and added threats to
their entreaties; as they had reason, for they had been at a prodigious
expense in raising an army, and the best part of the season was almost
spent. The Duke of Burgundy thought it highly for his honour that so
puissant an army as the emperor’s (consisting of the forces of so many
princes, prelates, and states), which amounted to a greater number than
had been assembled together since the memory of man, and for a long time
previously, were not able to force him to raise the siege. But he paid
dearly for his vanity; for the man who makes profit by a war, bears away
all the honour of it. However, the legate I mentioned before continued
his good offices on both sides so long, that at length a peace[431] was
concluded between the Emperor and the Duke of Burgundy, and Nuz was
delivered into the hands of the Pope’s legate, to be disposed of as his
Holiness should direct. But to what extremity must the Duke of Burgundy
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account