The memoirs of Philip de Commines, Lord of Argenton, Volume 2 (of 2) : $b Containing the histories of Louis XI. and Charles VIII. Kings of France, and of Charles the Bold, Duke of Burgundy. To which is added the Scandalous Chronicle, or, secret history of Louis XI., by Jean de Troyes.Commynes, Philippe de
History
The memoirs of Philip de Commines, Lord of Argenton, Volume 2 (of 2) : $b Containing the histories of Louis XI. and Charles VIII. Kings of France, and of Charles the Bold, Duke of Burgundy. To which is added the Scandalous Chronicle, or, secret history of Louis XI., by Jean de Troyes.
Commynes, Philippe de
France -- History -- House of Valois, 1328-1589
The king stayed not long there[304], but departed for Florence; where
they complained to him of the injury he had done to the Florentines,
and that it was contrary to his promise, to restore the Pisans to their
liberty. Those whom he appointed to answer their complaint, excused his
conduct in the best manner they could; alleging, that his majesty had not
been rightly informed, and they entered into another agreement, of which
I shall say something hereafter. But, in the first place, I must speak of
the fate of Peter de Medicis, and of the king’s entrance into Florence,
and of the garrisons that his majesty left in Pisa and other places,
which the Florentines had lent him.
After Peter de Medicis, by the consent of some few of his colleagues,
had delivered up the above-mentioned towns to the king, he returned to
Florence, where the people supposed the king would not keep them, but
that after he had refreshed himself for three or four days, and had
left Pisa, they would be delivered up again. I am of opinion that, had
the king proposed to them to remain there the whole winter, they would
easily have consented to it; though Pisa, except in the numbers of the
people, and the richness of their furniture, is of greater value and
importance to them than Florence itself. However, Peter de Medicis,
upon his return to Florence, was but coldly received by the people,
who looked discontentedly upon him, and not without reason; for he had
disarmed them of all their power and authority, and robbed them of
all the conquests they had gained for a hundred years before; so that
their hearts seemed to presage the calamities which have happened to
them since. For this cause (which I believe was the principal, though
they never declared it), for the hatred they bore him (as I have said
before), and for the recovery of their liberties, of which they believed
themselves deprived (without any respect to the services done them by
Cosmo and Laurence his predecessors), they resolved to drive him out
of the town. Peter de Medicis having some suspicion, but no certain
knowledge, of their designs, went to the palace to announce the king’s
approach, who was within three miles of the city; but coming, according
to his usual custom, with his guards, and knocking boldly at the palace
gate, he was denied entrance by one of the Nerli[305] (of whom there were
several brothers, with whom I was well acquainted, and also with their
father, all very wealthy people), who told him he might enter alone if he
pleased, but otherwise not; and he that gave him this answer was armed.
Upon which Peter de Medicis returned at once to his house, put himself
and his retainers in arms, and sent word to one Paul Ursini[306], who
was in the Florentine service; for by his mother’s side Peter de Medicis
was akin to the Ursini, and both his father and himself had always had
several of that family in their service; and he resolved to stand upon
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account