The memoirs of Philip de Commines, Lord of Argenton, Volume 2 (of 2) : $b Containing the histories of Louis XI. and Charles VIII. Kings of France, and of Charles the Bold, Duke of Burgundy. To which is added the Scandalous Chronicle, or, secret history of Louis XI., by Jean de Troyes.Commynes, Philippe de
History
The memoirs of Philip de Commines, Lord of Argenton, Volume 2 (of 2) : $b Containing the histories of Louis XI. and Charles VIII. Kings of France, and of Charles the Bold, Duke of Burgundy. To which is added the Scandalous Chronicle, or, secret history of Louis XI., by Jean de Troyes.
Commynes, Philippe de
France -- History -- House of Valois, 1328-1589
I have already mentioned the equipment of our fleet at Nice, and its
setting sail for the relief of the castles of Naples, which it was
unable to effect for the above-mentioned reasons; whereupon the Lord
de Montpensier, and the rest of the officers that were in the castles
aforesaid (perceiving their condition), resolved to march off by the
help of the army, which had been left in divers places for the defence
of that kingdom, and was then drawn as near the castle as possible; but
they left a number to defend the castles proportionable to the quantity
of provisions which remained; for they were insufficient to sustain them
all. And having given the command of the garrison to the Lord Ognas and
two other officers of conduct and experience, the Lord de Montpensier,
the Prince of Salerno, the Seneschal of Beaucaire and others, marched off
with two thousand five hundred men, for Salerno. King Ferrand pretended
it was contrary to their treaty, and that the hostages which they had
given him a few days before (which were the Lord d’Alegre, Monsieur
de la Marche d’Ardain[437], the Lord de la Chapelle d’Anjou, Monsieur
Roquebertin, a Catalonian, and one Monsieur Genly[438]), were at his
mercy, and that he might lawfully put them to death. You must understand
that some three months before, by intelligence with the enemy, and our
bad order, King Ferrand had got into the town of Naples[439], though
our men had notice of all his designs. I would enlarge upon this, but
I can say nothing of it except by hearsay (yet I had it from very good
hands); however, it is not my method to insist upon any thing that I was
not an eye-witness of myself. But while King Ferrand was in Naples, he
received the news of our master’s being killed in the battle of Fornovo;
and our men in the castle had the same news, from several letters and
stories forged by the Duke of Milan, which they believed as readily as
the Colonne, who revolted from us immediately, as desiring to be always
on the strongest side, though (as I said before) they were under great
obligations to the king. Upon these reports, but chiefly because our
men were confined in great numbers in the castle (where provisions were
scarce), and had lost all their horses and household stuff in the town,
they came to a treaty, on the 19th of October 1495, after they had been
besieged three months and fourteen days; and about three weeks after
making the treaty, they marched away. They had promised, that if they
were not relieved by a certain day, they would march off into Provence,
and leave the castles without doing any farther act of hostility against
that kingdom, either by sea or by land; for performance of which promise
the said hostages were given. And King Ferrand alleged they had broken
their promise by departing without leave; but our men affirmed the
contrary; howbeit, the hostages were in no little danger, and not without
cause. Whatever their articles were, I think our men did wisely to march
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account