The memoirs of Philip de Commines, Lord of Argenton, Volume 2 (of 2) : $b Containing the histories of Louis XI. and Charles VIII. Kings of France, and of Charles the Bold, Duke of Burgundy. To which is added the Scandalous Chronicle, or, secret history of Louis XI., by Jean de Troyes.Commynes, Philippe de
History
The memoirs of Philip de Commines, Lord of Argenton, Volume 2 (of 2) : $b Containing the histories of Louis XI. and Charles VIII. Kings of France, and of Charles the Bold, Duke of Burgundy. To which is added the Scandalous Chronicle, or, secret history of Louis XI., by Jean de Troyes.
Commynes, Philippe de
France -- History -- House of Valois, 1328-1589
But as to the designs which I have mentioned as being so considerable,
they began before the surrender of Gaeta, upon the Duke of Milan’s not
keeping his promise, and continued for two years after our king’s return.
As for the Duke of Milan, he did not break his promise so much out of
malice and deceit, as through fear; for he was fearful that the king
could not have so great an addition to his power, without some diminution
of his own; besides, he did not think our king a prince of any firmness
or resolution. At length it was concluded that the Duke of Orleans should
march to Asti with a considerable body of forces; and I saw him and his
troops ready to set out. We were secure of the Duke of Ferrara with
five hundred men-at-arms and two thousand foot (though he was the Duke
of Milan’s father-in-law); for he joined with us to preserve himself
against the danger he was in between the Duke and the Venetians, who
not long previously (as I have said before[480]) had taken from him the
Polesan, and endeavoured all they could to ruin him: upon which account
he preferred his own and his children’s safety before the friendship of
his son-in-law; and perhaps he was of opinion that his son-in-law would,
by his mediation, come to some agreement with the king, when he found
himself in danger. We had also engaged the Marquis of Mantua on our
side, who had been, and was at that time general for the Venetians; but
they were so jealous of him, and he so dissatisfied with them, that he
remained with three hundred men-at-arms with his father-in-law the Duke
of Ferrara, for his wife was sister to the Duchess of Milan, and the
Duke of Ferrara’s daughter. Signor John Bentivoglio (who was governor,
and as it were Prince of Bologna,) was to have provided a hundred and
fifty men-at-arms, besides the horse and foot which his two sons were
to have brought with them, and his country was well situated for an
attack on the Duke of Milan. The Florentines, who saw they were utterly
undone, and were afraid they should be dispossessed of Pisa and the
rest of their towns, unless they exerted themselves, and did something
extraordinary in this critical juncture of affairs, agreed to assist us
with eight hundred men-at-arms, and five thousand foot, and to maintain
them at their own expense; and they had six months’ pay ready in bank.
The Ursini and the Prefect of Rome[481] (who was brother to the Cardinal
of St. Peter ad Vincula, so often mentioned before), who were in the
king’s pay, would have brought a thousand men-at-arms, but you must
know the retinue and equipage of their men-at-arms is not so great as
ours; for they have no archers, but their pay is alike; for the pay of a
man-at-arms (if he is well paid) is one hundred ducats a year, but if he
be attended by archers it is double. These soldiers the king would have
paid, but the Florentines were to have paid their own forces. The Duke
of Ferrara, the Marquis of Mantua, and Signor Bentivoglio desired only
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account