The memoirs of Philip de Commines, Lord of Argenton, Volume 2 (of 2) : $b Containing the histories of Louis XI. and Charles VIII. Kings of France, and of Charles the Bold, Duke of Burgundy. To which is added the Scandalous Chronicle, or, secret history of Louis XI., by Jean de Troyes.Commynes, Philippe de
History
The memoirs of Philip de Commines, Lord of Argenton, Volume 2 (of 2) : $b Containing the histories of Louis XI. and Charles VIII. Kings of France, and of Charles the Bold, Duke of Burgundy. To which is added the Scandalous Chronicle, or, secret history of Louis XI., by Jean de Troyes.
Commynes, Philippe de
France -- History -- House of Valois, 1328-1589
guards, and within a league lay their whole army, which was more numerous
than ours, and ready to engage us. However, Monsieur de St. André managed
his affairs so prudently, and with so much secrecy, that in ten hours’
time he took the town (which I have seen) by assault[487] and in it there
were thirty or forty Spanish gentlemen of good quality slain, and among
them the son of the Archbishop of St. James’s[488], besides three or four
hundred more. They did not suppose we should have been masters of it so
soon, because they knew not the goodness of our cannon, which certainly
are the finest and best in Europe.
No other but this action happened between these two kings, and this was
much to the dishonour of the King of Castile, who had such a numerous
army in the field. But when God Almighty is pleased to chastise a nation
for its sins, He begins with such small and supportable afflictions;
for the King and Queen of Castile were visited afterwards with greater
afflictions, and so were we too. The King and Queen of Castile acted very
imprudently, and were ill-advised to forswear themselves to our master,
especially after he had been so friendly as to restore Roussillon, which
had cost his father so much to fortify and defend, and which had been
mortgaged to him for 300,000 crowns; all which was remitted to hinder
him from disturbing our king in his intended conquest of Naples. Besides
which, they renewed the ancient alliances with not only king and king,
kingdom and kingdom, but the individual subjects on both sides were
mutually bound; and they promised not to interrupt us in our conquest,
nor to marry any of their daughters with the houses of either Naples,
England, or Flanders; which offer came first from themselves, and was
made by one Friar John de Mauleon, on the part of the Queen of Castile.
Yet as soon as they saw the war begun, and the king at Rome, they sent
their ambassadors to all the neighbouring states to make an alliance
against our king; and particularly to Venice, where I was resident at
that time; and there the league (which I have spoken of so much) was
made between the Pope, the King of the Romans, the Signory of Venice,
the Spaniards, and the Duke of Milan; and immediately they began to act
offensively against our king, and to declare that their former obligation
had become void, and they were no longer bound to observe it, especially
that article about the marriage of their daughters (of whom they had
four, and but one son), though they first made that offer of themselves,
as you have already heard.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account