The memoirs of Philip de Commines, Lord of Argenton, Volume 2 (of 2) : $b Containing the histories of Louis XI. and Charles VIII. Kings of France, and of Charles the Bold, Duke of Burgundy. To which is added the Scandalous Chronicle, or, secret history of Louis XI., by Jean de Troyes.Commynes, Philippe de
History
The memoirs of Philip de Commines, Lord of Argenton, Volume 2 (of 2) : $b Containing the histories of Louis XI. and Charles VIII. Kings of France, and of Charles the Bold, Duke of Burgundy. To which is added the Scandalous Chronicle, or, secret history of Louis XI., by Jean de Troyes.
Commynes, Philippe de
France -- History -- House of Valois, 1328-1589
With these ambassadors of theirs our king sent back the Lord of
Clerieux[489], in Dauphiny, and endeavoured to conclude either a separate
peace or a truce with them, without comprehending any of the rest of
the confederates; but if the king had accepted their overture, he had
preserved Gaeta, which might have been sufficient for the recovery of the
whole kingdom, considering what friends his majesty had in it. When the
Lord of Clerieux returned, he brought new propositions, for Gaeta was
lost before he got to Castile. These propositions were, that the ancient
alliance between the two crowns should be renewed, and that by common
consent and expense they should endeavour the conquest of Italy, and that
both the kings should be personally present in that expedition.[490] But
first they insisted that a general truce might be concluded, wherein the
whole league should be comprehended, and a day and place appointed in
Piedmont, to which each of them might send their ambassadors; for they
were desirous to acquit themselves honourably towards their confederates.
But all this overture, in my opinion, (and I have understood as much
since), was but an artifice to gain time, and suffer King Ferrand and his
successor King Frederic to breathe a little. However, they would have
been contented to have had that kingdom to themselves, and their title
was better than that of those who possessed it; but our king’s title
(which was the house of Anjou’s) was better than either; yet, considering
the nature of the country, and the people who inhabit it, I think he has
best right to it that can keep possession of it, so strangely are they
inclined to revolutions.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account