The memoirs of Philip de Commines, Lord of Argenton, Volume 2 (of 2) : $b Containing the histories of Louis XI. and Charles VIII. Kings of France, and of Charles the Bold, Duke of Burgundy. To which is added the Scandalous Chronicle, or, secret history of Louis XI., by Jean de Troyes.Commynes, Philippe de
History
The memoirs of Philip de Commines, Lord of Argenton, Volume 2 (of 2) : $b Containing the histories of Louis XI. and Charles VIII. Kings of France, and of Charles the Bold, Duke of Burgundy. To which is added the Scandalous Chronicle, or, secret history of Louis XI., by Jean de Troyes.
Commynes, Philippe de
France -- History -- House of Valois, 1328-1589
intrigues for the purpose by means of an agent that lay incognito, whom I
privately conveyed into the king’s chamber not long before his death. The
Venetians were ready to join with us against the Duke of Milan, and our
negociations with Spain were as you have heard; the King of the Romans
desired nothing so earnestly as the friendship of our king, and that they
two might manage their own affairs in Italy by themselves. This King
of the Romans was called Maximilian, and he was a mortal enemy to the
Venetians, because they had taken and kept several places belonging to
the house of Austria, of which he was next heir, and heir to the empire
besides.
The king had also resolved within himself to live a more strict and
religious life than he had formerly done, to regulate the laws, to
reform the Church, and so to rectify his finances that he would not
raise above one million two hundred thousand francs upon his subjects by
way of annual tax, which was the sum given him by the three Estates at
their convention at Tours, upon his accession to the throne. He intended
the said sum should be employed in the defence of the kingdom, and for
himself he would live upon his crown lands, as his predecessors had done
before him; which he might easily have done if it had been well managed,
for his private revenue (comprehending his duties and customs) came to
above a million a year. Had he done as he resolved, it would have been a
great ease to the people, who pay now above two millions and a half. He
was very earnest likewise to have reformed the abuses in the order of St.
Benedict and others. He got good preachers about him, and was a constant
hearer of them. He would fain have ordered it so that a bishop should
have enjoyed but one bishopric, a cardinal two, and that all should have
been obliged to be resident upon their benefices; but he would have
found it a difficult task to have persuaded the clergy to it. He gave
alms liberally to the poor not many days before his death, as I was
since informed by his confessor the Bishop of Angers[504], who is a very
eminent prelate. He had erected also a place for public audience[505],
where he heard and dispatched causes, especially for the benefit of the
poor; in which place I saw him for two hours together, not above a week
before he died; after which time I never saw him again. Matters of great
moment were not dispatched at these audiences, but he had set up that
court to keep people in awe, and especially his officers, some of whom he
suspended for bribery and corruption.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account