The memoirs of Philip de Commines, Lord of Argenton, Volume 2 (of 2) : $b Containing the histories of Louis XI. and Charles VIII. Kings of France, and of Charles the Bold, Duke of Burgundy. To which is added the Scandalous Chronicle, or, secret history of Louis XI., by Jean de Troyes.Commynes, Philippe de
History
The memoirs of Philip de Commines, Lord of Argenton, Volume 2 (of 2) : $b Containing the histories of Louis XI. and Charles VIII. Kings of France, and of Charles the Bold, Duke of Burgundy. To which is added the Scandalous Chronicle, or, secret history of Louis XI., by Jean de Troyes.
Commynes, Philippe de
France -- History -- House of Valois, 1328-1589
About the time of the king’s death there were great divisions among the
Florentines. Some expected the king’s return, and very earnestly desired
it, upon confidence in Friar Jerome’s assurance; and in that confidence
they exhausted and ruined themselves in their expenses to promote the
recovery of Pisa and the rest of the towns which they had delivered to
the king; but Pisa remained in possession of the Venetians. Some of the
citizens were for siding with the league and deserting our king; and
these alleged that all was but folly and delusion, and that Friar Jerome
was a heretic and a hypocrite, and that he ought to be put into a sack
and thrown into the river; but he had friends in the town who protected
him against that fate. The Pope and the Duke of Milan wrote often against
him, assuring the Florentines that Pisa and the rest of their towns
should be restored, if they would abandon our king and punish Friar
Jerome. It accidentally happened, that at the time of the king’s death
the Signory consisted chiefly of Friar Jerome’s enemies (for the Signory
in that city is changed every two months), who suborned a Cordelier[508]
to quarrel with him, and to proclaim him a heretic and an abuser of the
people, in pretending to revelation, and to declare publicly that he
had no such gift; and, to prove what he said, he challenged him to the
ordeal of fire before the Signory. Friar Jerome had more wit than to
accept this challenge; but one of his brethren[509] offered to do it for
him, and another of the Cordeliers[510] volunteered to do as much on
the other side; so that a day[511] was appointed when they were to come
to their trial, and both of them presented themselves to enter the fire
accompanied by all the friars of their orders. The Jacobite brought the
Host in his hand, which the Signory and Cordeliers insisted he should
lay by; but the Jacobite, being obstinate to the contrary, and resolved
not to part with it, they returned all to their convents. Whereupon
the people, encouraged by Friar Jerome’s enemies, and authorised by
the Signory, went to his convent and fetched him and two more of his
brethren[512] out, and tortured them most cruelly, killing the chief man
in the city (called Francisco Vallori[513]), only for being his friend.
The Pope sent them power and commission to make out process against him,
and at last he and his two brethren were burnt.[514] The charge against
him consisted only of two articles; that he created disorder in the
city, and that he was an impostor; and that what he pretended to know by
revelation he was told by his friends in the council. For my own part I
will neither condemn nor excuse him, nor will I say they did ill or well
in putting him to death; but I am sure he foretold several things which
afterwards came to pass, and which all his friends in Florence could
never have suggested. And as to our master and the evils with which he
threatened him, they happened exactly as you have heard, first the death
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account