The memoirs of Philip de Commines, Lord of Argenton, Volume 2 (of 2) : $b Containing the histories of Louis XI. and Charles VIII. Kings of France, and of Charles the Bold, Duke of Burgundy. To which is added the Scandalous Chronicle, or, secret history of Louis XI., by Jean de Troyes.Commynes, Philippe de
History
The memoirs of Philip de Commines, Lord of Argenton, Volume 2 (of 2) : $b Containing the histories of Louis XI. and Charles VIII. Kings of France, and of Charles the Bold, Duke of Burgundy. To which is added the Scandalous Chronicle, or, secret history of Louis XI., by Jean de Troyes.
Commynes, Philippe de
France -- History -- House of Valois, 1328-1589
Before the expiration of the four years, some clerks of Provence produced
a new will of King Charles I.[201], brother to St. Louis, and the
wills of other kings of Sicily of the house of France. By these it was
pretended, that not only the county of Provence belonged to the king, but
the kingdom of Sicily also, and other places possessed by the house of
Anjou, and that the Duke of Lorraine had no title to any of them (which
other people denied). And those who were against the Duke of Lorraine’s
title, addressed themselves to this Stephen de Vers, who persuaded his
master that the last King Charles, Count of Provence, son of Charles
of Anjou, Count du Maine, and nephew to King René, had left it to him
by his will; for King René had made him his heir before he died, and
preferred him before the Duke of Lorraine, who was his daughter’s son;
and this, they urged, was done by King René, in consideration of the
wills of Charles I. and his wife, the Countess of Provence, by which
they had enjoined that that kingdom and the county of Provence should
not be separated, nor descend to a daughter, whilst there was a son
living of their line. And they affirmed that the wills of their immediate
successors, and particularly the will of Charles II.[202], were to the
same effect.
During these four years, they that had the management of the king (who
were the Duke and Duchess of Bourbon, and a chamberlain named the Lord
of Graville[203], and other lords of his bed-chamber, who at that time
had great power) sent for the Duke of Lorraine to court, and put him into
places of great trust and authority, in order that, as he was a person
of a more enterprising temper than most of the courtiers, he might aid
and assist them in their undertakings[204]; besides, they questioned not
to find a way to get rid of him when they had no further need of him, as
they did afterwards, when they found they were strong enough to manage
affairs by themselves, and that the power of the Duke of Orleans[205]
and the rest of the nobility in his faction was weakened. But after the
expiration of the four years, the Duke of Lorraine refused to stay any
longer at court, unless they would either put him into possession of
the county of Provence, or secure it to him in writing at a fixed time,
and meanwhile continue his pension of thirty-six thousand francs: to
which they would not agree; so the Duke of Lorraine left court, highly
disgusted with their conduct.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account