The memoirs of Philip de Commines, Lord of Argenton, Volume 2 (of 2) : $b Containing the histories of Louis XI. and Charles VIII. Kings of France, and of Charles the Bold, Duke of Burgundy. To which is added the Scandalous Chronicle, or, secret history of Louis XI., by Jean de Troyes.Commynes, Philippe de
History
The memoirs of Philip de Commines, Lord of Argenton, Volume 2 (of 2) : $b Containing the histories of Louis XI. and Charles VIII. Kings of France, and of Charles the Bold, Duke of Burgundy. To which is added the Scandalous Chronicle, or, secret history of Louis XI., by Jean de Troyes.
Commynes, Philippe de
France -- History -- House of Valois, 1328-1589
To return to our principal matter: you have already been informed how
the Count di Cajazzo, and the other ambassadors, took their leave of the
king at Paris; how several secret negotiations were carried on in Italy;
and how the heart of our king (though he was very young) was strangely
bent upon this expedition; which, however, he discovered to none but the
two persons[258] above-mentioned. His request to the Venetians was that
they would give him their assistance and counsel in his expedition; and
they returned this answer: That he should be very welcome in Italy, but
that they were wholly incapable of assisting him, upon account of their
continual apprehensions of the Turk[259] (though at that time they were
at peace with him); and to undertake to advise so wise a king, who had so
grave a council, would savour of too much presumption on their part; but
they would rather assist than disturb him in his designs.
This they believed a very discreet answer, and truly so it was; and I
am of opinion that their affairs are managed with more prudence and
discretion at this day, than the affairs of any other princes or states
in the world: but God will still have us know, that the wisdom and policy
of man is of no avail where He pleases to interpose; for He orders things
many times quite otherwise than were expected. The Venetians did not
imagine that the king would come in person, and (whatever they pretended)
they had no apprehension of the Turk; for the Turk who then reigned was a
man of no courage nor activity. But their design was to be revenged upon
the House of Arragon, both father and son, for whom they had a mortal
hatred, because (as they said) it was at their instigation that the Turk
fell upon them at Scutari.[260] I mean the father of this present Turk,
called Mahomet Ottoman, who conquered Constantinople, and did abundance
of mischief besides to the Venetians. They had several complaints also
against Alphonso, Duke of Calabria, and, among the rest, they said that
he had been the occasion of the war which the Duke of Ferrara had made
upon them, which was very expensive, and had like to have proved their
ruin. They complained also that he had sent a man to Venice, expressly
to poison their cisterns, at least such as he could come at; for some
are kept under lock and key. In that city they use no other water (for
they are wholly surrounded by the sea); but that water is very good,
and I drank of it eight months together, in my first embassy thither
(for I have been there once since). But these were not the true reasons
of their animosity to the House of Arragon; the real occasion was,
because the father and son restrained them, and kept them from extending
their conquests both in Italy and Greece; for their eyes were upon
them on every side, and yet, without any title or pretence, they had
lately subdued the kingdom of Cyprus.[261] Upon these considerations the
Venetians thought it would be highly for their advantage if a war should
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account