========+===========+==============+==============+==============+==============+==============+==============+==============+==============+==============+==============+===+===+===+===+========
[Footnote *: Aided by experimenter.]
The evidence suggests that in this young orang utan ideational learning
tended to replace the simpler mode of problem solution by trial and
error. Seemingly incapable of solving his problems by the lower grade
process, he strove persistently, and often vainly, to gain insight. He
used ideas ineffectively. Animals far lower in intelligence (e.g., the
pig), surpass him in ability to solve these relational problems because
they use the method of elimination by trial consistently and
effectively. Julius, in these experiments, made a poor showing because
his substitute for trial and error is only slightly developed. Would he
have succeeded better with the same problems if mentally mature?
There are many important features of the results which, for lack of
space, have not been indicated or discussed. They can be developed from
later comparative studies of the data, for in the tables appear all of
the essential facts of response apart from those mentioned in the text.
IV
RESULTS OF SUPPLEMENTARY TESTS OF IDEATIONAL BEHAVIOR
1. Julius, _Pongo pygmaeus_
_Box Stacking Experiment_
In addition to the multiple-choice experiments which have been described
in detail in the previous section, it was possible to conduct certain
less systematic tests of ideational behavior in the monkeys and the
orang utan. From the technical standpoint these tests were relatively
unsatisfactory because only inexactly describable. But their results are
in many respects more interesting, if not also more important, in the
light which they throw on ideation than are those previously presented.
First, in order of time, comes a test which may be designated as the box
stacking experiment. The method will now be described in connection with
an account of the behavior of Julius as contrasted with that of a child
of three years and four months of age.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account