The Mercantile MarineChatterton, E. Keble (Edward Keble)
History
The Mercantile Marine
Chatterton, E. Keble (Edward Keble)
Merchant marine -- Great Britain -- History; Merchant marine -- History
It is sea-borne trade which makes a Mercantile Marine. It is the great
coalfields conveniently near big harbours that have helped to build up
the modern British marine after her shipping was temporarily eclipsed
by the American. The development of the world consequent on the coming
of the industrial age, the great increase of overseas trade therefrom
resulting, caused a loud and universal call for cheap maritime
carriage. The steamer satisfied that call, for the reason that she was
built economically near to the coalfields, and economically propelled
because she had cheap coal. She could therefore afford to carry goods
cheaply. Then, as we have also seen, this tramp is the forerunner of
the liner, and so the story goes on like a stone gathering momentum as
it comes down the mountain.
So it all depends on cheap fuel quite as much as on cheap labour. The
Scandinavians have had the latter for years, but it never enabled
them to build up such a merchant fleet as one might have expected.
The world’s greatest shipping centre to-day is the Port of London,
notwithstanding the great set-back it received during the war, when the
presence of German submarines in the English Channel diverted much of
its ancient trade to western ports. Had it not been for the possession
of an enormous merchant fleet, consisting of a large proportion
of small and moderate-sized steamers, the Allied cause would most
certainly have been lost, irrespective of the Army in the field or the
Navy at sea. The British and German blockades, though exerted in the
one case by big ships and in the latter by submarines, had the same
effect: the paralysing of the merchant fleet. Take the blockade away
and the war could have gone on as long as a couple of men were alive.
The pivot of the whole thing is therefore the merchant ship, and she in
turn depends on her fuel.
The fuel of the future will be oil, and you will find only a minority
of experts to deny this. Whether aircraft will ever become the
principal passenger-carriers over the world is possible, but remote.
For the carriage of goods the dependence will remain on merchant
shipping, and one of the incentives to the use of oil-fuel will be
brought about by increased competition. Oil is the more economical
fuel, for the reason that, other things being equal, one ton of
oil-fuel as now used in Diesel engines drives a vessel three times as
far as one ton of coal burnt under the boilers of a steamship. And yet
oil is twice as efficient as coal when the ship has water-tube boilers
and geared turbines. This is the statement of Sir Westcott Abell, the
Chief Ship Surveyor of Lloyd’s Register. The biggest liners have now
been converted into oil-burning, and it is conceivable that before long
we may have Diesel-engined Atlantic leviathans instead of steamers.
The absence of boilers will mean more room for passengers and cargo,
therefore increased earning capacity.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account