But again, it is sometimes said that whatever be the case with our
present adult consciousness, our original impulses were all directed
towards pleasure[53] or from pain, and that any impulses otherwise
directed are derived from these by “association of ideas.” I can find
no evidence that even tends to prove this: so far as we can observe the
consciousness of children, the two elements, extra-regarding impulse
and desire for pleasure, seem to coexist in the same manner as they
do in mature life. In so far as there is any difference, it seems to
be in the opposite direction; as the actions of children, being more
instinctive and less reflective, are more prompted by extra-regarding
impulse, and less by conscious aim at pleasure. No doubt the two
kinds of impulse, as we trace back the development of consciousness,
gradually become indistinguishable: but this obviously does not justify
us in identifying with either of the two the more indefinite impulse
out of which both have been developed. But even supposing it were found
that our earliest appetites were all merely appetites for pleasure, it
would have little bearing on the present question. What I am concerned
to maintain is that men do not _now_ normally desire pleasure alone,
but to an important extent other things also: some in particular having
impulses towards virtue, which may and do conflict with their conscious
desire for their own pleasure. To say in answer to this that all men
_once_ desired pleasure is, from an ethical point of view, irrelevant:
except on the assumption that there is an original type of man’s
appetitive nature, to which, as such, it is right or best for him to
conform. But probably no Hedonist would expressly maintain this; though
such an assumption, no doubt, is frequently made by writers of the
Intuitional school.
NOTE.--Some psychologists regard Desire as essentially painful. This
view seems to me erroneous, according to the ordinary use of the term:
and though it does not necessarily involve the confusion--against
which I am chiefly concerned to guard in the present chapter--between
the volitional stimulus of desire itself and the volitional stimulus
of aversion to desire as painful, it has some tendency to cause
this confusion. It may therefore be worth while to point out that
the difference of opinion between myself and the psychologists in
question--of whom I select Dr. Bain as a leading example--depends
largely, though not entirely, on a difference of definition. In chap.
viii. of the second division of his book on _The Emotions and the
Will_, Dr. Bain defines Desire as “that phase of volition where there
is a motive and not ability to act on it,” and gives the following
illustration:--
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account