The micro-organisms of the soilRussell, Edward J. (Edward John)
Science
The micro-organisms of the soil
Russell, Edward J. (Edward John)
Soil microbiology
It has usually been assumed that the changes in the external conditions
markedly affect the density of the soil population. To test this the
environmental conditions--temperature, moisture content and rainfall
were examined; but contrary to all expectation no connection could be
traced between any of these and the daily changes in numbers of any
of the organisms investigated, and moreover the species of protozoa
appeared in the main to be living independently of one another.
It is difficult to believe that external conditions are as inoperative
as appears from the above; and in view of the known complexity of
the soil it is possible that further research will show that certain
combinations of external conditions are important agents in effecting
the changes.
[Illustration: FIG. 11.--Numbers of active amœbæ (Dimastigamœba and
Species α) and bacteria to 1 gram of field soil for typical periods in
February and April, 1921. (From Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc., vol. ccxi.)
X-axis: Feby. Feby. April
Y-axis (left): Amoebae Active numbers per gramme of soil
Y-axis (right): Bacteria millions
Legend: Dimastigamoeba
Species α
Bacteria]
In the case of the bacteria, however, the agent causing the
fluctuations is mainly the active amœbæ. This was well shown during the
year’s count, for with only 14 per cent. of exceptions, 10 per cent.
of which can be explained as due to rapid excystation or encystation,
a definite inverse relationship was established between the active
numbers of amœbæ and the number of bacteria (Figs. 11 and 12). Thus a
rise from one day to the next in the amœbic population was correlated
with a fall in the numbers of bacteria and vice versa. It must not be
supposed that the flagellates are of no account in this process; some
species, known to eat bacteria, undoubtedly induce slight depressions,
but, owing to their small size, any effect is masked by the greater
one of the amœbæ.
[Illustration: FIG. 12.--Numbers of active amœbæ (Dimastigamœba and
Species α) and bacteria in 1 gram of field soil for typical periods in
September, October, and November, 1920.
X-axis: August September October
Y-axis (left): Amoebae, thousands
Y-axis (right): Millions, Bacteria
Legend: Dimastigamoeba
Species α
Bacteria]
These experiments seem to admit of no doubt that in field soil the
active protozoa are instrumental in keeping down, below the level
they might otherwise have attained, the numbers of bacteria; but a
further proof of this contention ought to be obtained by inoculation
experiments. It should be possible, by inoculating sterile soil
with bacteria alone and with bacteria plus protozoa, to demonstrate
fluctuations in bacterial numbers in the latter, while those of the
former remained constant. This admittedly crucial test has often been
tried, but owing to difficulties in technique, etc., has always failed.
Recently, however, by using new methods confirmatory results have been
obtained.[5]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account