The Microscope. Its History, Construction, and Application 15th ed.: Being a familiar introduction to the use of the instrument, and the study of microscopical scienceHogg, Jabez
History
The Microscope. Its History, Construction, and Application 15th ed.: Being a familiar introduction to the use of the instrument, and the study of microscopical science
Hogg, Jabez
Microscopy; Natural history
The study of the chemistry (_chemotaxis_) of bacteria has, however,
greatly enlarged our conception of the chemical value and power of
the vegetable cell, while it is obvious that no more appropriate
or remunerative field of study could engage the attention of the
microscopist, as well as the chemist, than that of bacterial life, and
which is so well calculated to enlarge our views of created organisms,
whether belonging to the vegetable or animal kingdom.
Pathogenic Fungi and Moulds.
It is scarcely necessary to go back to the history of the parasitic
fungi to which diseases of various kinds were early attributable.
The rude microscopes of two and a half centuries ago revealed the
simple fact that all decomposable substances swarmed with countless
multitudes of organisms, invisible to ordinary vision. Leuwenhoek, the
father of microscopy, and whose researches were generally known and
accepted in 1675, tells of his discovery of extremely minute organisms
in rain-water, in vegetable infusions, in saliva, and in scrapings
from the teeth; further, he differentiated these living organisms
by their size and form, and illustrated them by means of woodcuts;
and there can be no doubt that his figures are intended to represent
leptothrix filaments, vibrios, and spirilla. In other of his writings
attempts are made to give an idea of the size of these “animalcules”;
he described them as _a thousand times smaller than a grain of sand_.
From his investigations a belief sprung up that malaria was produced
by “animalcules,” and that the plague which visited Toulon and
Marseilles in 1721 arose from a similar cause. Somewhat later on the
natural history of micro-organisms was more diligently studied, and
with increasing interest. Müller, in 1786, pointed out that they had
been too much given to occupy themselves in finding new organisms, he
therefore devoted himself to the study of their forms and biological
characters, and it was on such data he based a classification. Thus the
scientific knowledge gained of these minute bodies was considerably
advanced, and the subject now entered upon a new phase: the origin
of micro-organisms. It further resolved itself into two rival
theories--spontaneous generation, and development from pre-existing
germs--the discussion over which lasted more than a century. Indeed,
it only ended in 1871, when the originator of the Abiogenesis theory
withdrew from the contest, and the more scientific investigations of
Pasteur (1861) found general acceptance. This indefatigable worker
had been investigating fermentation, and studying the so-called
diseases of wines and a contagious disease which was committing ravages
among silkworms. Pasteur in time was able to confirm the belief that
the “muscadine disease” of silkworms was due to the presence of
micro-organisms, discernible only by the microscope. The oval, shining
bodies in the moth, worm, and eggs had been previously observed and
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account