The Microscope. Its History, Construction, and Application 15th ed.: Being a familiar introduction to the use of the instrument, and the study of microscopical scienceHogg, Jabez
History
The Microscope. Its History, Construction, and Application 15th ed.: Being a familiar introduction to the use of the instrument, and the study of microscopical science
Hogg, Jabez
Microscopy; Natural history
This excess will be _seen_ if we take an oil-immersion objective
of, say 122° balsam angle, illuminating it so that the whole field
is filled with the incident rays, and use it first on an object not
mounted in balsam, but dry. We then have a _dry objective_ of nearly
180° angular aperture, for, as will be seen by reference to Fig. 36,
the cover-glass is virtually the first surface of the objective, as
the front lens, the immersion fluid, and the cover-glass are all
approximately of the same index, and form, therefore, a front lens
of extra thickness. When the object is close to the cover-glass the
pencil radiating from it will be very nearly 180°, and the emergent
pencil (observed by removing the eye-piece) will be seen to utilise as
much of the back lens of the objective as is equal to twice the focal
length, that is, the _inner_ of the two circles at the head of Fig. 35.
If now balsam be run in beneath the cover-glass so that the angle of
the pencil taken up by the objective is no longer 180°, but 122° only
(that is, _smaller_), the diameter of the emergent pencil is _larger_
than it was before, when the angle of the pencil was 180° in air, and
will be approximately represented by the _outer_ circle of Fig. 35. As
the power remains the same in both cases, the larger diameter denotes
the greater aperture of the immersion objective over a dry objective of
even 180° angle, and the excess of aperture is made plainly visible.
Having settled the principle, it is still necessary, however, to find a
proper _notation_ for comparing apertures. The astronomer can compare
the apertures of his various objectives by simply expressing them in
inches, but this is obviously not available to the microscopist, who
has to deal with the ratio of two varying quantities.
In consequence of a discovery made by Professor Abbe in 1873, that a
general relation existed between the pencil admitted into the front of
the objective and that emerging from the back of the objective, he was
able to show that the ratio of the semi-diameter of the emergent pencil
to the focal length of the objective could be expressed by the formula
_n_ Sin _u_, _i.e._, by the sine of half the angle of aperture (_u_)
multiplied by the refractive index of the medium (_n_) in front of the
objective (_n_ being 1·0 for air, 1·33 for water, and 1·52 for oil or
balsam).
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account