The Microscope. Its History, Construction, and Application 15th ed.: Being a familiar introduction to the use of the instrument, and the study of microscopical scienceHogg, Jabez
History
The Microscope. Its History, Construction, and Application 15th ed.: Being a familiar introduction to the use of the instrument, and the study of microscopical science
Hogg, Jabez
Microscopy; Natural history
This angle is now determined by the arc of glass between the screens;
thus we get an angle in _glass_ the exact equivalent of the aperture of
the objective. As the numerical apertures of these arcs are engraved
on the apertometer, they can be read off by inspection. A difficulty
is not infrequently experienced from the fact that it is not easy to
determine the exact point at which the edge of the screen touches
the periphery of the back lens, or rather the limit of the aperture.
Zeiss, to meet this difficulty, made a change in the form of the
apparatus--furnished a glass disc mounted on a metal plate, with a slot
for the purpose of its more accurate adjustment.[17]
Stereoscopic Binocular Vision.
Professor Wheatstone’s remarkable discovery of stereoscopic vision
led, at no distant period, to the application of the principle to
the microscope. It may therefore prove of interest to inquire how
stereoscopic binocular vision is brought about. Indeed, the curious
results obtained in the stereoscope cannot be well understood without
a previous knowledge of the fundamental optical principles involved
in this contrivance, whereby two slightly dissimilar pictures of any
object become fused into one image, having the actual appearance of
relief. The invention of the stereoscope by Sir Charles Wheatstone,
F.R.S., 1838, and improved by Brewster, was characterised by Sir John
Herschel as “one of the most curious discoveries, and beautiful for
its simplicity, in the entire range of experimental optics,” led to
a more general appreciation of the value of the conjoint use of both
eyes in conveying to the mind impressions of the relative form and
position of an object, such as the use of either eye singly does not
convey with anything like the same precision. When a near object having
three dimensions is looked at, a different perspective representation
is seen with each eye. Certain parts are seen by the right eye, the
left being closed, that are invisible to the left eye, the right
being closed, and the relative positions of the portions visible
to each eye in succession differ. These two visual impressions are
simultaneously perceived by both eyes, and combined in the brain into
one image, producing the effect of perspective and relief. If truthful
right-and-left monocular pictures of an object be so presented to the
two eyes that the optic axes when directed to them shall converge at
the same angle as when directed to the object itself, a solid image
will be at once perceived. The perception of relief referred to is
closely connected with the doubleness of vision which takes place
when the images on corresponding portions of the two retina are not
similar. But, if in place of looking at the solid object itself we look
with the right and left eyes respectively at pictures of the object
corresponding to those which would be formed by it on the retina of the
two eyes if it were placed at a moderate distance in front of them, and
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account