The Microscope. Its History, Construction, and Application 15th ed.: Being a familiar introduction to the use of the instrument, and the study of microscopical scienceHogg, Jabez
History
The Microscope. Its History, Construction, and Application 15th ed.: Being a familiar introduction to the use of the instrument, and the study of microscopical science
Hogg, Jabez
Microscopy; Natural history
Fig. 42 represents a sectional view of Abbe’s stereoscopic eye-pieces,
which consist of three prisms of crown glass, _a_, _b_ and _b′_, placed
below the field-glass of the two eye-pieces; the tube _c_ is slipped
into the tube or body like an ordinary eye-piece. The two prisms _a_
and _b_ are united so as to form a thick plate with parallel sides,
inclined to the axis at an angle of 38·5°. The cone of rays from
the objective is thus divided into two parts, one being transmitted
and the other reflected; that transmitted passing through _a b_ and
forming an image of the object in the axial eye-piece B. Adjustment
for different distances between the eyes is effected by the screw
placed to the right-hand side of the figure, which moves the eye-piece
B′, together with the prism _b′_, in a parallel direction. The tubes
can also be drawn out, if greater separation is required. The special
feature of this instrument is that on halving the cone of rays by
turning the caps, an orthoscopic or pseudoscopic effect is produced.
This double-eyed piece arrangement of Abbe’s has not been at all
brought into use in this country; this is partly owing to its original
adaptation for use with the shorter Continental body-tube of 160 mm.,
and not for our 10-inch body.
The most perfect method of securing pleasing satisfactory stereoscopic
vision of objects is that devised by Mr. Wenham. In his binocular
microscope an equal division of the cone of rays, after passing through
the objective is secured and again united in the eye-pieces, which
act as one, so that each eye is furnished with an appropriate and
simultaneous view of the object. The methods contrived by the earlier
experimenters not only materially interfered with the definition of
the objective and object, but also required expensive alterations and
adaptations of the microscope, and sometimes separate stands for their
employment. Mr. Wenham’s invention, on the contrary, offers no such
obstacle to its use, and the utility of the microscope as a _monocular_
is in no way impaired either when using the higher powers.
[Illustration: Fig. 43.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account