The Middle Kingdom, Volume 1 (of 2): A Survey of the Geography, Government, Literature, Social Life, Arts, and History of the Chinese Empire and its InhabitantsWilliams, S. Wells (Samuel Wells)
History
The Middle Kingdom, Volume 1 (of 2): A Survey of the Geography, Government, Literature, Social Life, Arts, and History of the Chinese Empire and its Inhabitants
Williams, S. Wells (Samuel Wells)
China
The census of 1711 (No. 8), is the first one on record which bears
the appearance of credibility, when its several parts are compared
with each other. The dates of the preceding (Nos. 6 and 7), are rather
uncertain; the last was extracted by Dr. Morrison from a book published
in 1790, and he thought it was probably taken as early as 1650,
though that is unlikely. The other is given by Dr. Medhurst without
any explanation, and their great disparity leads us to think that
both are dated wrongly. The census of 1711 is much more consistent in
itself, though there are some reasons for supposing that neither did it
include all the population then in China. The census was still taken
for enrolment in the army, and to levy a capitation tax upon all males
between the ages of sixteen and sixty. But this tax and registration
were evaded and resisted by the indignant Chinese, who had never been
chronicled in this fashion by their own princes; the Emperor Kanghí,
therefore, abolished the capitation tax. It was not till about this
time that the Manchus had subdued and pacified the southern provinces,
and it is not improbable that this census, and the survey taken by
the Jesuits, were among their acts of sovereignty. Finding the people
unwilling to be registered, the poll tax was merged in the land tax,
and no census ordered during the reign of Yungching, till Kienlung
revived it in order to have some guide in apportioning relief during
seasons of distress and scarcity, establishing granaries, and aiding
the police in their duties. Many, therefore, who would do all in their
power to prevent their names being taken, when they were liable to be
taxed or called on to do military service, could have no objection to
come forward, when the design of the census was to benefit themselves.
It matters very little, however, for what object the census was taken,
if there is reason to believe it to have been accurate. It might
indeed act as a stimulus to multiply names and figures whom there were
no people to represent, as the principle of paying the marshals a
percentage on the numbers they reported did in some parts of New York
State in 1840.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account