The migrations of early culture: A study of the significance of the geographical distribution of the practice of mummification as evidence of the migrations of peoples and the spread of certain customs and beliefs — John Shaqi
The migrations of early culture: A study of the significance of the geographical distribution of the practice of mummification as evidence of the migrations of peoples and the spread of certain customs and beliefsSmith, Grafton Elliot
History
The migrations of early culture: A study of the significance of the geographical distribution of the practice of mummification as evidence of the migrations of peoples and the spread of certain customs and beliefs
Smith, Grafton Elliot
Ethnology; Human beings -- Migrations; Mummies
people, who placed in their burial mounds “bronze articles which were
probably imported in the course of trade with Babylonia” (=12=, p. 29).
“They were probably the builders of the remarkable series of rude stone
monuments which crown the hills in the Nilgiri range and the plateau of
the Deccan” (p. 28). The most ancient stone monuments in Southern India
contain objects which go to prove that they were built at the earliest
just before the introduction of iron-working. Thus, if the knowledge of
iron-working came from Europe, these monuments could not have been built
much before 800 B.C. As a matter of fact it is known that many of them
cannot be older than 600 B.C. (Crooke, =13=, p. 129). All of these facts
agree in supporting the view that the influence of Egypt, which, so far
as the matters under consideration are concerned, came into operation
not earlier than the eighth century B.C., spread to India partly _viâ_
Babylonia and partly by way of East Africa, somewhere between the close
of the eighth and the commencement of the sixth century B.C.
The monuments to which I have just been referring were not, in my
opinion, directly inspired by Egypt, but indirectly. The North Syrian
and the adjoining territories adopted the Egyptian burial customs at
an earlier period and the finished type of holed dolmen was probably
developed and survived in that region long after its Egyptian prototype
had become a thing of the past. The real types that have come down to our
times are found in the Caucasus, between the Black Sea and the Caspian.
The Indian dolmens were certainly imitations of these models. But in
respect of other buildings the Indians directly adopted Babylonian and
Egyptian types. I have already referred to the former. Many of the
Dravidian temples are so precisely modelled on the plan of the Theban
temples of the New Empire that to question the source of the inspiration
of the former is impossible.
“Fergusson first called attention to the striking similarity in general
arrangement and conception between the great South Indian temples and
those of ancient Egypt.... The gopurams or gate-towers, which in the
later more ornate examples are decorated from the base to the summit with
sculptures of the Hindu Pantheon, increase in size with the size of the
walled quadrangles, the outer ones becoming imposing landmarks, which
are visible for miles around, and are strikingly similar to the pylons
of Egyptian temples” (Thurston, =101=, pp. 158 and 161). Thus in the
matter of its early buildings India has clearly been influenced by Egypt,
Phœnicia and Chaldea; and this great cultural wave impinged upon the
Indian peninsula not before the close of the eighth century B.C.
It is important also to remember that it reached India just (perhaps not
more than a century) before another wave of a very different culture
poured down from the north, and introduced, among other things, the
practice of cremation.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account