The migrations of early culture: A study of the significance of the geographical distribution of the practice of mummification as evidence of the migrations of peoples and the spread of certain customs and beliefsSmith, Grafton Elliot
History
The migrations of early culture: A study of the significance of the geographical distribution of the practice of mummification as evidence of the migrations of peoples and the spread of certain customs and beliefs
Smith, Grafton Elliot
Ethnology; Human beings -- Migrations; Mummies
For our immediate purpose this is unfortunate, because that practice
is inspired by ideas utterly opposed to those underlying the custom of
embalming, and naturally destroyed most, though by no means all, traces
of the latter. That the practice of embalming did actually reach India
from the west is known not merely because evidence of unmistakably
Egyptian technique is found further east, but also because in India and
Ceylon there are definite traces of the custom, to which reference has
already been made in the foregoing pages. Cases from Persia, Ceylon,
India, Burma and Thibet were cited in proof of the survival of elements
of the embalming process or ritual, even when the Brahmanical and
Buddhist burial practices had been adopted.
From the foregoing account there can be no doubt that the people of
India did at one time practice mummification, at any rate in the case of
their chiefs. They also acquired a knowledge of the arts and crafts, as
the result of the influence exerted by the rich stream of culture which
brought the attainments of the great western civilizations to India
before the Ayran immigration. The bringers of this new culture mingled
their blood with the aboriginal pre-Dravidian population and the result
was the Dravidians. It is not at all improbable that the resultant
Dravidian civilization had reached a higher plane than that of the Aryas,
who entered the country after them.
In Oldham’s interesting and suggestive brochure (=51=, pp. 53-55), which,
in spite of Crooke’s drastic criticism, seems to me to be a valuable
contribution to a knowledge of the questions under discussion, the
following passages occur:—
“The Asuras, Dasyus, or Nagas, with whom the Aryas came into contact, on
approaching the borders of India, were no savage aboriginal tribes, but
a civilized people who had cities and castles. Some of these are said in
the Veda to have been built of stone.
“It would seem, indeed, as if the Asuras had reached a higher degree of
civilization than their Aryan rivals. Some of their cities were places of
considerable importance. And, in addition to this, wealth and luxury, the
use of magic, superior architectural skill, and ability to restore the
dead to life, were ascribed to the Asuras by Brahmanical writers.”
The “ability to restore the dead to life” is probably a reference to the
Egyptian ritual of “the opening of the mouth,” which of course is an
integral part of the funerary procedure incidental to the practice of
mummification.
“The Nagas occupy a very prominent position in connection with Indian
astronomy, and this is not likely to have been assigned to them, by their
Brahmanical rivals, without good reason. Probably this and other branches
of science were brought, by the Asuras, from their ancient home in the
countries between the Kaspian and the Persian Gulf.
“The close relationship between the Indian and the Chaldean astronomical
systems has been frequently noticed.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account