The mind of primitive man : $b A course of lectures delivered before the Lowell Institute, Boston, Mass., and the National University of Mexico, 1910-1911Boas, Franz
Science
The mind of primitive man : $b A course of lectures delivered before the Lowell Institute, Boston, Mass., and the National University of Mexico, 1910-1911
Boas, Franz
Ethnopsychology; Race
Another fundamental difference between the mental life of primitive man
and that of civilized man lies in the fact that we have succeeded in
developing, by the application of conscious reasoning, better systems
from these crude, unconscious classifications of the sum total of our
knowledge, while primitive man has not done so. The first impression
gained from a study of the beliefs of primitive man is, that while the
perceptions of his senses are excellent, his power of logical
interpretation of perceptions seems to be deficient. I think it can be
shown that the reason for this fact is not founded on any fundamental
peculiarity of the mind of primitive man, but lies, rather, in the
character of the traditional ideas by means of which each new perception
is interpreted; in other words, in the character of the traditional
ideas with which each new perception associates itself. In our own
community a mass of observations and of thoughts is transmitted to the
child. These thoughts are the result of careful observation and
speculation of our present and of past generations; but they are
transmitted to most individuals as traditional matter, much the same as
folk-lore. The child associates new perceptions with this whole mass of
traditional material, and interprets his observations by its means. I
believe it is a mistake to assume that the interpretation made by each
civilized individual is a complete logical process. We associate a
phenomenon with a number of known facts, the interpretations of which
are assumed as known, and we are satisfied with the reduction of a new
fact to these previously known facts. For instance, if the average
individual hears of the explosion of a previously unknown chemical, he
is satisfied to reason that certain materials are known to have the
property of exploding under proper conditions, and that consequently the
unknown substance has the same quality. On the whole, I do not think
that we should try to argue still further, and really try to give a full
explanation of the causes of the explosion.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account