The mind of primitive man : $b A course of lectures delivered before the Lowell Institute, Boston, Mass., and the National University of Mexico, 1910-1911Boas, Franz
Science
The mind of primitive man : $b A course of lectures delivered before the Lowell Institute, Boston, Mass., and the National University of Mexico, 1910-1911
Boas, Franz
Ethnopsychology; Race
The second theory that has been advanced to explain the sameness of a
number of fundamental ideas and inventions is based on the assumption
that they represent old cultural achievements belonging to a period
previous to the general dispersion of the human race.
This theory is based on the universal distribution of certain cultural
elements. Obviously it can apply only to features that occur the world
over; for, if we should admit the loss of some of them in the course of
historical development, the door would be open to the most fanciful
conclusions. A few ethnological data seem to favor this theory, and make
us inclined to believe that some of the universal traits of culture may
go back to a very early time before that dispersion of mankind which is
demanded on biological grounds. Most important among these is perhaps
the occurrence of the dog as a domesticated animal in practically all
parts of the world. It is true that in all probability native wild dogs
constitute the principal ancestry of the dogs of the various continents;
but nevertheless, it seems plausible that the living-together of man and
dog developed in the earliest period of human history, before the races
of northern Asia and America separated from those of southeastern Asia.
The introduction of the dingo (the native dog) into Australia seems to
be most easily explained when we assume that it accompanied man to that
remote continent.
Other very simple activities may perhaps be derived from achievements of
the earliest ancestors of man. The art of fire-making, of drilling,
cutting, sawing, work in stone, belonged probably to this early age, and
may have been the heritage on which each people built up its own
individual type of culture (Weule). If archæological investigations
should show that implements and other evidences of human achievement are
found in a geological period during which mankind had not attained its
present world-wide distribution, we should have to infer that these
represent the early cultural possessions of man, which he carried with
him all over the world. In this lies the great and fundamental
importance of the eolithic finds that have been discussed so extensively
during the last few years. Language is also a trait common to all
mankind, and one that therefore may have its roots in earliest times.
The activities of the higher apes seem to favor the assumption that
certain arts may have belonged to man before his dispersion. Their habit
of making nests, that is, habitations, the use of sticks and stones,
point in this direction.
All this makes it plausible that certain cultural achievements date back
to the origin of mankind. The defenders of this theory, like Weule and
Graebner, also believe that a sporadic occurrence of certain inventions
like the boomerang, among races that are held to be akin in descent, may
have originated before the differentiation and dispersion of these
races.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account