Great Britain -- History -- Henry III, 1216-1272; Henry III, King of England, 1207-1272
[531] Between 15th and 18th July; _Pat. Rolls Joh._, pp. 149, 149 b.
[532] _Ib._ p. 182 b, 13th September, 1215.
[533] Bliss, _Calendar_, vol. i. p. 56.
[534] _Ib._ p. 58.
[535] R. Coggeshall, p. 186.
[536] On the date of this correspondence see Professor Powicke’s
article on “The Chancery during the Minority of Henry III,” _Eng. Hist.
Rev._, vol. xxiii. p. 229.
[537] _Roy. Lett._, vol. i. p. 113.
[538] _Ib._ p. 112.
[539] _Ib._ p. 117.
[540] _Roy. Lett._, vol. i. p. 120.
[541] “Si ... ad beatum Martyrem visitandum ire velitis.”
[542] _Ib._ pp. 119–121.
[543] On the whole subject of Chancellor, Vice-chancellor, and custody
of the seals, and on Richard de Marsh and Ralf de Neville, see Powicke,
pp. 223–231.
[544] “Per vicarium,” _Dial. de Scaccario_, lib. i. c. xv.
[545] Professor Powicke, p. 228, says positively that this was so,
citing as his authority “_Rot. Claus. passim_.” So far as I can see,
however, these Rolls contain no actual proof that the “R. camerarius”
who figures in them together with the treasurer and another chamberlain
whose initial is “F.” is Ralf de Neville. The identification seems to
be an inference from Pandulf’s injunctions about “paying nothing out.”
[546] This is clear from the tone of Pandulf’s letters. See especially
the letter of 12th May--“Rogamus autem et monemus prudentiam tuam ut
_verbum secretum quod tibi diximus_ studeas loco et tempore fideliter
procurare.” _Roy. Lett._, vol. i. p. 119.
[547] Pandulf issues his orders “_legationis_ qua fungimur auctoritate”
(_ib._), because in his case the secular authority of the regent was
included in and covered by the legatine authority. He had been made
regent just because he was the Pope’s Legate.
[548] _Ib._ p. 116.
[549] “Ad factum scaccarii detis operam efficacem, sicut regi et regno
cognoscatis expedire,” _Foedera_, I. i. p. 157, January, 1220.
[550] _Ann. Dunst._ a. 1223, p. 84.
[551] There is no authority for the oft-repeated assertion that
Hubert’s father was brother to William FitzAudelin.
[552] For their relationship see Sweetman, _Calendar of Documents
relating to Ireland_, vol. i. No. 2217.
[553] _Pat. Rolls Joh._, p. 9.
[554] R. Howden, vol. iv. p. 163.
[555] R. Coggeshall, pp. 139–140.
[556] _Ib._ p. 154.
[557] See references in Dugdale, _Baronage_, vol. i. p. 693.
[558] Before 7th April; _Close Rolls_, vol. i. p. 142.
[559] Before 11th April (1215); _ib._ p. 194.
[560] _Pat. Rolls Joh._, p. 138, 24th May, 1215.
[561] Between 15th June, when he figures in the Great Charter as
“senescallus Pictaviae,” and 25th June, when he appears for the first
time as “Justiciarius Angliae,” _Ib._ p. 144 b. He himself seems to
have stated in 1239 “quod dominus Johannes Rex tradidit ei justitiariam
apud Runingmede coram domino Stephano Archiepiscopo, comite Warannae,
comite de Ferrariis, et aliis magnatibus”; _Responsiones_ (M. Paris,
_Chron. Maj._, vol. vi.), p. 65.
[562] M. Paris, _Chron. Maj._, vol. iii. pp. 28, 29.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account