Great Britain -- History -- Henry III, 1216-1272; Henry III, King of England, 1207-1272
[762] On 22nd January a letter close was sent to Aumale bidding
him trust what two persons named therein should say to him on
the King’s behalf; _Close Rolls_, vol. i. p. 446. This, from its
tone, would seem to have been despatched in ignorance of the
Fotheringay outrage--certainly before the assembly in which Aumale
was excommunicated again. The date of that assembly is given in the
Dunstable Annals, _l.c._, as “in die Conversionis Sancti Pauli.” But
the excommunication is announced, as having already taken place, in a
letter dated January 23rd, _Roy. Lett._, vol. i. p. 169.
[763] Cf. W. Cov., _l.c._, and _Ann. Dunst._, p. 64.
[764] “Tum quia castrum domini sui regis proditione cepit antequam
ipsum difidasset.” I think this sentence of the Dunstable annalist
(_l.c._) tends to confirm the Barnwell writer’s statement that
Fotheringay was in the custody of Hubert. Strictly speaking,
Fotheringay was never “a castle of his (Aumale’s) lord the King,”
_i.e._, King Henry; it was a castle of the Earl of Huntingdon’s, and
held of the King of Scots; Henry had only the right to its custody
during the minority of the heir, and he had committed it to Alexander
as custodian. If, however, Alexander had (as he very likely may have
done) placed it temporarily in Henry’s hand, to be garrisoned by
Henry’s men under Henry’s justiciar, the Dunstable writer’s words
would be far more intelligible than if they were applied to it when
in the keeping of the Earl of Chester, who we know was, at some date
before--unluckily there is nothing to prove how long before--12th
March, 1221, appointed custodian of the honour of Huntingdon not by
Henry, but, with Henry’s sanction, by Alexander; see above, footnote
748.
[765] _Ann. Dunst._, p. 64.
[766] _Roy. Lett._, vol. i. p. 169. This letter, dated 23rd January,
is addressed to Geoffrey de Neville. There can be no doubt that a like
summons was sent to the other sheriffs and barons, and that the muster
was a general one.
[767] W. Cov., vol. ii. p. 248.
[768] _Roy. Lett._, vol i. p. 171. He left Bytham on 31st January; _ib._
[769] _Close Rolls_, vol. i. p. 474 b.
[770] W. Cov., _l.c._
[771] _Close Rolls_, vol. i. p. 448.
[772] _Ann. Dunst._, _l.c._
[773] W. Cov., vol. ii. pp. 248, 249.
[774] R. Wend., vol. iv. p. 67.
[775] W. Cov., vol. ii. p. 249. _Ann. Dunst._, p. 64.
[776] _Ann. Dunst._, _l.c._
[777] R. Wend., vol. iv. pp. 67, 68.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account