[820] “Mandatum est de Norwico electo quod procuret quomodo poterit diffusas treugas ex parte domini Regis cum comite Marchiae inire; quibus optentis, Savaricum de Maloleone inducat et moneat ac (_sic_) ad Dominum Regem festinet, cui (_sic_) faciet de petitionibus suis Deo dante quod bene erit” etc.; _Close Rolls_, vol. i. p. 477 b. As the rest of the letter shows clearly that it was not Pandulf who was to “hasten to the King,” I can only suppose that _ac_ should be _ut_ and _cui_ should be _qui_. [821] _Pat. Rolls_, vol. i. pp. 329, 330, 13th April, 1222. [822] See above, p. 169. [823] _Querimonia Falcasii_, W. Cov., vol. ii. p. 260. [824] See above, p. 170. [825] “Miles strenuus ac morum honestate commendabilis, regisque Anglorum magister et eruditor fidelissimus.” R. Wend., vol. iv. p. 75. He was one of the commanders in the sea-fight off Sandwich in August, 1217; see above, p. 52. [826] Turner, pt. II. p. 262. Peter went some time before 16th April, _Pat. Rolls_, vol. i. p. 286, and must have been back before 21st June, when Philip d’Aubigné had already set out for Holy Land, _ib._ p. 293. [827] _Ib._ pp. 284, 293, and Turner, _l.c._ [828] He sailed from Marseille for Damietta on 15th August; see his own letter in R. Wend., vol. iv. p. 75, where it is put under a wrong year, 1222. [829] _Ann. Wav._, a. 1221. [830] _Ann. Dunst._, p. 75. [831] “Cum autem Wintoniensis Episcopus de partibus Hispaniae esset reversus, ipsumque regem post excessum pupillaris aetatis a sua fateretur custodia liberatum.” _Quer. Falc._, p. 260. [832] See orders to sheriff--who of course was Peter’s deputy--for cleaning and repairing the royal lodgings, hall, painted chamber, kitchen, &c., _Close Rolls_, vol. i. p. 483. Roger of Wendover, vol. iv. p. 75, says “Rex ... fuit ad Natale apud Wintoniam, episcopo civitatis Petro omnia sibi necessaria ministrante.” So he did, no doubt, but as sheriff acting under orders and at the King’s expense, not as host. [833] W. Cov., vol. ii. p. 251. [834] See prohibitions in Patent Rolls _passim_. [835] “Treugas ... quas coepit, ut praedictis significavit, ut interim in partibus Lincolniae sua possit usitare et expendere.” _Roy. Lett._, vol. i. p. 172. There seems to be a noun omitted in connexion with “sua”; I think the meaning of the sentence must be as I have rendered it. [836] _Ib._ pp. 172, 173.