But how about philosophy? It was moonshine until it began to
investigate the elementary properties of matter and energy, and
elementary properties are ultimate properties. And religion will be
subject to quackery and hypocrisy until it ceases worrying about
ultimate properties and busies itself with making earth a paradise. So
moonshine mixed with quackery and hypocrisy is the substance of those
movements having other than a narrow, earthly aim. No coins are liable
to be counterfeited save those which are honored at some bank outside
of our humdrum sphere. And as science is supposed to be matter of fact
and practical, quack scientists become unthinkable.
When, however, was it that philosophy left off being moonshine? It must
have been some time ago, for even the ancient Greeks--to say nothing
of the Hindus and Chinese--were eager to investigate the elementary
properties of matter and energy. As they were in the habit of keeping
their science a secret from the common man, we do not know how much
science they had. But it is evident from their philosophy that they
were always thinking about matter and energy. Their conclusions may
sound quaint--though not quite so quaint today as a half-century
ago--but it is certain that moonshine was largely mixed with
observation until modern metaphysics, predominantly German, took the
field. I cannot stop to prove this, but I refer Mr. Dorsey to any Story
of Philosophy, even Will Durant’s. I also recommend that he read some
good history of science, for he says on page 86: “Science knows nothing
of the ultimate origin of the source of energy; it only accepts both
facts [what facts?] and goes on with its business of trying to find out
what matter is and what energy can do. In other words, the problem of
the origin of life is locked up in the origin of matter and of energy.”
One often hears this allegation--that science goes on with its own
business, leaving the problem of ultimate origin aside. Yet every major
hypothesis which science has ever constructed is an attempt to account
for this very ultimate origin--or primal origin, if you prefer. It
could not be otherwise. How could science try “to find out what matter
is” without at the same time trying to find out how matter originated?
Neither matter nor energy is a fact, isolated and handed out on a plate
for human use. Science must needs attempt to discover the nature of
that with which it works. And the only way to explain a fact, let alone
acquiring the power of producing phenomena at will, is by discovering a
preceding or accompanying fact.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account