At their festivals, “men and women lay together in the fields,
and behaved as did all other primitive peoples in their religious
festivals.... Not until the Christian idea of morality was brought to
them did the Celts grow conscious of any wickedness in their old rites.
And even then they did not give them up at once. Indeed, to this day
their descendants have not given them up entirely.”[203]
“The difference between [the] Babylonian cult of Ishtar and the
primitive Celtic cult of Bridget was entirely one of degree.... Both
were inspired by dread of the same evil, sterility: and both sought
to attain one end, fecundity. But one, the Babylonian, was far less
primitive ... far less wildly promiscuous and bestial. The Babylonian
rites were conducted within the confines of stone temples, not out in
the furroughs of the torch-lit fields.”[204]
This undoubtedly gave the Babylonians the ethical advantage. And it
seems that the Celtic gods and goddesses were not only primitive, but
continually kept their followers alarmed lest they (the goddesses)
should forget how to become fecund. The ritual in the furrows of the
torch-lit fields, “to this day not given up entirely,” was for the
purpose of overcoming the deities’ “bashfulness,” Browne tells us, and
to set them an example of what was desired. And if the spirit of Paul
could have had its way, such a ritual, though perhaps conducted within
stone temples, would have been established in Rome! And there it would
doubtless have been practiced today--as it is, I gather from Browne, in
present-day Ireland!
“The spirit of Jesus flickering in Christianity made it at least
nominally a religion of ethics,” Browne goes on. “For Jesus, one must
remember, had not been in the least concerned with ritual. Like every
other great Jewish prophet, he had preached only ethics. And despite
all the compromises of the world-conquering Pauls, that ethical
emphasis of the teaching of Jesus persisted as a mighty leaven in the
church. It gave to the early Christians that gentle nobility which
history tells us graced their faith.”[205]
When was this? Brown says that “of the life of the first Nazarenes we
know exceedingly little.”[206] He gives the year 67 as the date of St.
Paul’s martyrdom. Can it be that the early Christians were gentle and
noble even after the loose sex ideas and loose theological terms of the
great Apostle had been given a chance to begin their deadly work?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account