The Missouri PersecutionsRoberts, B. H. (Brigham Henry)
History
The Missouri Persecutions
Roberts, B. H. (Brigham Henry)
Latter Day Saints -- Missouri -- History -- 19th century
In laying our case before your honorable body, we say that we are
willing, and always have been, to conform to the Constitution and laws
of the United States, and of this State. We ask in common with others
the protection of the laws. We ask for the privileges guaranteed all
free citizens of the United States and of this State to be extended to
us, and that we may be permitted to settle and live where we please,
and worship God according to the dictates of our own conscience
without molestation. And while we ask for ourselves this privilege, we
are willing all others should enjoy the same.
Elder David H. Redfield was appointed to present this petition to the
legislature; and on that mission he arrived at Jefferson City on the
seventeenth day of December. The same day of his arrival he had an
interview with Governor Boggs, in which the governor manifested much
interest, and on being informed that the Missourians were committing
depredations against the saints, promised to write Judge King and
Colonel Price ordering them to put down every hostile appearance.
In the course of this conversation Boggs admitted that the
"stipulations entered into by the Mormons to leave the State, and
signing the deeds of trust, were unconstitutional and not valid."
"We want the legislature to pass a law to that effect, showing
that the stipulations and deeds of trust are not valid and are
unconstitutional," said Redfield, and went on to say if they did not,
the character of the State was forever lost.
Previous to the arrival of Redfield, the governor's exterminating
order, General Clark's reports, the report of the _ex parte_
investigation at Richmond, and a lot of other papers, had been
forwarded to the legislature and referred to a special joint committee.
That committee reported the day following Redfield's arrival at
Jefferson City, the eighteenth of December. And to show in what bad
repute these documents were held by this committee, I need only say
that it refused to allow them to be published with the sanction of the
legislature, because the evidence adduced at Richmond in a great degree
was _ex parte_ and not of a character to be desired for the basis
of a fair and candid investigation. The report concluded with three
resolutions: one to the effect that it was inexpedient at that time to
prosecute further the inquiry into the cause of the late disturbances;
another to the effect that it was inexpedient to publish any of the
documents accompanying the governor's message in relation to those
disturbances; the last favored the appointment of a joint committee
from the house and senate to investigate the troubles and the conduct
of the military operations to suppress them. These resolutions were
subsequently referred to a joint select committee with instructions to
report a bill in conformity thereto, and to which I shall again allude.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account