The Missouri PersecutionsRoberts, B. H. (Brigham Henry)
History
The Missouri Persecutions
Roberts, B. H. (Brigham Henry)
Latter Day Saints -- Missouri -- History -- 19th century
The message of the governor of Missouri to the general assembly of
the State, then in session, communicated on November 20th, 1838,
recommended a commission of both houses of the Legislature to inquire
into the "Mormon" difficulties. The house, in committee of the whole on
the state of the Republic, November 22nd, appointed a select committee
of seven to co-operate with such number from the senate as that body
might appoint, to inquire into the "causes of said disturbances, and
the conduct of the military operations in suppressing them, with power
to send for men and papers." The senate, on November 23rd, appointed
Messrs. Turner, Noland and Scott, as their part of said committee, thus
concurring in the action. This committee reported in the senate, on
December 18th, that they had taken the matters submitted to them into
consideration, and decided that they "thought it unwise and injudicious
under all the circumstances of the case to predicate a report from
the papers, documents, etc., purporting to be copies of the evidence
taken before an examining court, held in Richmond, Ray County, for the
purpose of inquiring into the charges alleged against the people called
'Mormons,' growing out of the difficulties between that people and
other citizens of the State."
The reasons given are: The evidence given in that examination was in
a great degree _ex parte,_ and not of a character to afford a "fair
and impartial investigation." The papers had been so certified as
to satisfy the committee of their authenticity. There were still
charges pending against some of the "Mormons" for treason, murder
and other felonies, which charges were to be tried before the courts
in the several counties, where such crimes were charged to have been
committed. Publication of the evidence and papers referred to might
affect seriously the right of trial by a "jury of the vicinage," by
prejudicing public sentiment against the accused. Were the committee
to act and send for papers and persons, it might interfere with the
action of the courts wherein the suits were pending. For this reason
the committee recommended the appointment of a committee, who should,
after the adjournment of the assembly, go into the vicinity of the
scenes of the difficulties, there to make inquiry and make proper
report to the legislature of their inquiry and examination when
concluded. Among other reasons given for such recommendation occur
these: that the "documents, although serviceable in giving direction
to the course of inquiry, are none of them, except the official orders
and correspondence, such as ought to be received as conclusive evidence
of the facts stated." And that it "would not be proper to publish the
official orders and correspondence between the officers in command, and
the executive, without the evidence on which they were founded; and
that evidence is not sufficiently full and satisfactory to authorize
its publication."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account