Banks and banking -- Great Britain; Finance -- Great Britain
“The Bank of England reserve, which constitutes the only real reserve
of the country, is shown here in its true light from our present
point of view. A further outside reserve of, say, £15,000,000 would
only, it is true, serve to restore the proportion to that of the year
1896, but it would ensure the present maximum becoming, in effect,
the future minimum, and here would be a great gain in an extra sense
of security in troublous times. Should a gold panic at any time
seize upon the public, it would matter little whether the ratio of
Bank of England reserve to the aggregate liabilities were 2·50 or 5
per cent., suspension of cash payments would ensue. A credit panic,
as distinguished from a gold panic, can usually be assuaged by a
suspension of the Bank Act and an overissue of bank-notes. A further
object of an increased gold reserve is that not only the periodic and
well-recognised, but the unexpected and perhaps heavy withdrawals of
gold may be met without recourse to violent measures such as those to
which the market is too often subjected. If this were clearly seen to
be not only the intention, but the practical working of the fund, an
objection which, I admit, is of great weight would be fairly met, and
minor objections would almost disappear.
“The objection to which I refer is this. Gold is meant to circulate,
not to be hoarded, and any proposal permanently to withdraw such an
amount as £15,000,000 from circulation and, as it were, entomb it again
in the bowels of the earth, stands self-condemned. No such entombment
is suggested, as far as I know, but the formation of a fund for use—a
fund which, on occasions, would pass into circulation—international,
if not national—and would have a steadying effect on the pulse of the
Empire, the Bank of England rate. How can we set about securing it? Let
us glance at the tabulated bank balance sheets of the country. From
which of the items on the assets side could such a sum be withdrawn?
Loans and discounts? No. Investments? No. Buildings? No. Money at call?
No. Cash in hand and at Bank of England? This, _ex hypothesi_, is the
item to be increased. The reasons I need not give, but it appears
tolerably plain that no plan involving a permanent diminution of any
item on the asset side would meet with a favourable reception from
practical men. Is it possible, if these items cannot be conveniently
decreased, to obtain the amount by a fresh creation of credit, an
addition to loans and discounts, and an equivalent addition to the
other side of the account? Please understand that I am considering the
case quite apart from the Bank of England.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account