Nur ed din was a wise and just ruler, as well as a brave and fearless
warrior, and a resolute defender of Islam. Being master of Mosul and
Aleppo he was also master of North Syria, but in the south he lacked
power through not having Damascus. Mejr ed din Abak the last of the
Seljuks of Damascus ruled there, or more correctly, his vizir ruled at
his commission. After Zenky’s death Damascus sent troops to retake
Baalbek. Eyub made terms and surrendered the city receiving in return
ten villages in that region. A few years later he became
commander-in-chief of the Damascus army, a position which he held when
Nur ed din marched against Damascus in 1154. Shirkuh, brother of Eyub,
had meanwhile taken service with Nur ed din. When the Syrian army
appeared before the city Shirkuh opened negotiations with his brother
and Eyub surrendered the place to the son of his old friend. Thus
Damascus abandoned its hereditary sovereign and Mejr ed din withdrew
from the city. He received in exchange Emesa, then Balis, and went
finally to Bagdad.
An earthquake had nearly ruined Damascus, but Nur ed din restored the
city and made it his capital. During his reign of twenty-eight years he
captured fifty castles or more and established mosques and schools in
every city of his dominion. Policy as well as religion caused Nur ed
din to favor the Abbasid line instead of the Fatimids of Cairo. The
time seemed to him ripe then to end Cairo helplessness, a genuine
helplessness since civil war raged there between Dargham a commander
and Shawer the vizir who under the Kalif were struggling for mastery.
Early in 1163, the year following that in which Nur ed din had
conquered Haram and taken possession of many Syrian fortresses, Shawer
who had been driven from Cairo came to Damascus and promised not only
to pay the cost of an invasion but afterward to yield up one third of
the income of Egypt if Nur ed din would give him certain aid against
Dargham. Nur ed din was not opposed to obtaining a foothold in the
country, still he withheld assistance till April of the following year,
when he sent his able and ambitious governor of Emesa, Essed ed din
Shirkuh, with an army into Egypt. Dargham was slain and Shawer was
restored to his former position. Freed from his enemy and safe, as he
thought, he refused to fulfil the conditions he had made. Shirkuh
enraged by his treachery seized the eastern province, Sherkiya, and the
chief town, Belbeis.
Shawer, who was an artful unprincipled man, false to his friends, to
his warriors and to his own interests, then called in Amalric, Count of
Askalon and king of Jerusalem, to act with the Crusaders against
Shirkuh. The friend of the Egyptian vizir was now his foe, and the
Crusaders had become the ally of their erstwhile enemy. Between Amalric
and Nur ed din there was keen rivalry, for neither man would permit the
other to become master in Egypt.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account